Jordan National Movement

Jordan National Movement

King Abdullah II Continues Abusing Jordanians at Home...

Shopping In Italy and Abusing Jordanians at Home: The Despicable Actions of King Abdullah II...

JNM, Amman-Jordan (Sunday, October 25, 2009): King Abdullah II’s Hit and Run Squad has struck again! This time the victim is the opposition leader Laith Shubeilat…the assault took place today around 7:30PM at a bread bakery in downtown Amman. Five men wearing civilian clothes followed Mr. Shubeilat to this bakery, jumped out of their Mercedes vehicle and then started attacking him from the back….Mr. Shubeilat was rushed to the hospital after he sustained several injuries in the head and face (see above picture). The attackers left the scene immediately in their Mercedes that carries a false plate number (a tacit maneuver and tactic usually used and conducted by the Intelligence community in Jordan). The police claimed that the incident was a result of an intense argument between Mr. Shubeilat and a few people in the bakery, a flat lie denied by Mr. Shubeilat and several eye witnesses happened to be in the bakery at that time. Mr. Shubeilat stated that the attack is an absurd revenge by the authorities after he delivered a recent speech at the Jordan Writers Association in which he accused the current regime of corruption, human rights abuses and failing to deliver genuine political reforms. In this lecture, Mr. Shubeilat specifically accused King Abdullah II of “selling the state’s real state and lands and deposit the proceeds in his personal accounts.” The Head of the Engineers Association in Jordan, Mr. Abdullah Obeidat, accused the regime’s men who defend clamping down on opposition and freedom of speech for “designing and carrying out this cowardly attack….These people are abusing us and our national unity, standing in the way for freedom of speech…They are punks…refuse and afraid of listening to other opinions and ideas…They are simply bunch of cowards.”

 

King Abdullah II and his wife just came back from an official visit to Italy, showing off the other side of their ugly faces and shopping in Rome for the latest fashions…spending hundreds of thousands of dollars from the state’s budget while the people of Jordan are reeling from abject poverty and lack of freedom to speak up and speak out against their absolute monarchy….In Jordan, no one has access to or even the right to know the budget of the royal family and how much they spend from the state’s coffers…The current budget deficit stands at $1.7 billion and the foreign debt has now reached $13.2 billion!!! 

 

This man, King Abdullah II, is not ashamed of himself nor does he deserves any respect from the local and International communities. He rules Jordan with the iron fest and is indeed a military dictator that we must remove from power as soon as possible. This man has reached the point that he must be condemned in the strongest terms by all national and International human rights organizations, local and national personalities and worldwide human rights activists, and leaders of civil societies. King Abdullah II has reached the absolute political fleecing and he does not deserve any respect by anybody at home or abroad.

 

The Jordan National Movement (JNM) condemns this cowardly act of terror designed and ordered by King Abdullah II and his Gestapo-like security forces, urges all advocates of human rights to condemn this thuggish dictator and asks other nations to stop providing any financial and military assistance to this foolish, abusive and corrupt regime.

Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZDnjVqUe68

Shame in King Abdullah II's House

JNM, Amman-Jordan (Sunday, August 2, 2009): On Thursday, July 30, 2009, King Abdullah II gave the green flag to his Darak (Gendarmerie) Forces to attack a peaceful sit-in held by workers at the Jordan Ports Corporation (JPC) in the southern city of Aqaba. The protesters simply asked for fair distribution of profit after the JPC sold a housing project belongs to the JPC’s employees. These barbaric forces insisted that this sit-in must end in five minutes or they will use force. Within a few minutes, the Darak Forces attacked the peaceful protesters, beat them up severely and arrested more than 65 of them. Mr. Ahid Alawneh (right picture above), an employee of the corporation, was thrown out of a fast-moving vehicle belongs to Darak, according to several eye witnesses. Mr. Alawneh airlifted to the King Hussein Medical City in Amman on Thursday for extensive medical care after he sustained several serious injuries in his body. Dozens of protesters in this sit-in were injured, some of these injuries described by medical doctors as “severe and life-threatening.” Several political activists, human rights advocates and journalists in Jordan have condemned these barbaric attacks and asked the regime to put an immediate end to these irresponsible and cowardly acts of terrorism against the people of Jordan.

 

The Darak Forces were established and supported by King Abdullah II (see above the king attending one of Darak’s events). Its mission is to prevent holding public meetings and demonstrations, terrorize the people of Jordan and bring them on their knees.

 

As a result of these ongoing attacks ordered directly by the king, it is difficult to have sympathy for the Hashemite tyrant, but King Abdullah II keeps trying to buy friends and influence in the international community. The king's orders to attack peaceful protesters, human rights activists, reporters, writers, and journalists have increased over the past few months and weeks. Many diplomatic observers in Amman firmly believe that this is an indication that the countdown of the regime’s total collapse is ticking. Recently, the king expressed fear that Jordan will be a substitution country for the Palestinian people instead of Palestine (West Bank and Gaza). The great majority of Jordanians (Eastern and those of Palestinian origin) have been living in peace, security and harmony since 1948 despite many attempts by the Hashemite regime to divide them. However, the real threat that the king is fearing right now is that his dictatorial regime will be replaced by a free and democratic system, which is a genuine desire in the hearts and minds of millions of Jordanian citizens.

 

Further, abuses of human rights, travesties of justice, unequal distribution of national resources, political oppression and abject poverty breed indefinite cycles of violence and vicious acts of terrorism. These dimensions of daily hardship are widespread and growing rapidly in Jordan. The current condition in Jordan is unbearable and heading towards a situation worse than what was happening in Iraq during Saddam Hussein’s era. The current regime has absolute executive power of appointing and dismissing governments, creating illegitimate and rubber stamp parliaments by picking and firing senior judges, senators and high-ranking advisers. These ongoing circumstances are creating potential junior and senior terrorists who would have nothing but hate towards those countries that support absolute monarchical regimes in the Arab world.

 

The Jordan National Movement (JNM) condemns these ongoing attacks and strongly believes that these acts represent not just a clear setback for basic human rights, but a political fleecing despite well-publicized denials from the king himself and his timocracy and appointed government. We profess today our deep concern and resentment regarding the tragic collusion displayed by King Abdullah II and his secret police. This must not be replicated under any circumstances. We call upon all worldwide defenders of human rights to do everything within their power to focus upon, censure and condemn human rights violations by King Abdullah II, his intelligence community and Gestapo-like security forces.

 

The U.S., Europe and the civil world have to face this reality: Either discontinue supporting absolute monarchical regimes in the Middle East region or face a countless number of angry people. Those oppressed and freedom-loving people will turn to violence and terrorism and do everything at their disposal to vent out their immense anger at the U.S. and other countries that support these cruel and rogue regimes.

 

Hence, the Jordan National Movement (JNM) urges all democratic countries, worldwide free societies and international civil institutions to take bold, practical and courageous measures against the current corrupt absolute monarchical system in Jordan. We need to work together to curb this regime’s double-faced local and foreign policies that have deceived the global civilized community regarding its daily dictatorial activities against the people of Jordan. We must work hand-in-hand to defeat growing terrorism in the Arab world: Peacefully and democratically!  

10 Years of Injustice and Oppression: The Fairy Tale of King Abdullah II’s Absolute Dictatorship and Accession to the Undemocratic Throne

King Abdullah II (left) & with his Freind Odday Saddam Hussein (right)

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

 

King Abdullah II’s fixation on maintaining the absolute political monopoly of his family--the Hashemites--has left him standing on shaky ideological ground. He has refused to accept the constitutional monarchy and threatened those proactive leaders, such as Mr. Rheil Gharibeh, who have demanded this basic right, with prison sentence. Jordanians have questioned the ruling Hashemite family’s monopoly on political power and, by speaking out publicly, they have violated the rules of game in Jordan, which rely on a high degree of pretense and tacit complicity about the political system’s contradictions. The opposition leaders such as Dr. Ahmed Oweidi Al-Abbadi, Toujan Faisal, Laith Shbeilat, Ahmed Obeidat, and Rheil Gharibeh are leading unprecedented movement to make real changes in the constitution, criticizing King Abdullah II’s undemocratic rule, rampant human rights abuses and corruption practices, and his pursuit of economic modernization without genuine political reforms.

 

Since King Abdullah II assumed his absolute monarchy on Tuesday, June 9, 1999, extrajudicial killings rose, and torture and limits on freedom of expression continue to pose an intensive and serious plight. The travesty of justice and democracy in Jordan is a fact. On June 7, 2009, Rana Sabagh, a well-respected and an independent Jordanian columnist and former Reuter news writer stated, “The 2007 Parliament elections represent an unprecedented crisis and political scandal.” Jawad Bashiti, another independent columnist, described these elections as a “political prostitution.” According to a scientific poll conducted by the Centre for Strategic Studies at the University of Jordan, published on May 27, 2009, “53 per cent of Jordanians are not satisfied with the performance of the current Parliament in general and 56 per cent are not satisfied with performance of their representative….with one quarter of the population saying they support dissolving Parliament before its term ends.” CSS pollster Mohammad Masri commented that "A retreating confidence among the public towards their representatives in Parliament reflects that the political milieu in the Kingdom is unhealthy and lacking the conditions necessary to ensure a balance. This will further diminish public interest in this establishment."

 

The last ten years were filled with unpleasant events. Public freedom is restricted under laws passed by Parliament whose members were elected via vote-buying and unprecedented fraud. On a daily basis, many Jordanian civil rights leaders and reporters are being dragged to the security and intelligence authorities simply because they are mobilizing the public against absolute monarchy. They are protesting and writing hard-hitting stories about local developments that have enraged high government officials including members of the royal family. Advocates of a free press and freedom of expression charge that the arrest of political leaders, journalists and several other unknown reporters is part of growing regime efforts and concerted campaign to crack down on Jordanian publications. The press body firmly deems that what has happened is a massive conspiracy and despotic move by the regime. The regime has proscribed newspapers, bribed journalists via hush money and monthly stipends (exploiting their economic hardship), arrested and beaten up dozens of reporters, slapped draconian laws on the press that would definitely curb media freedoms. The king’s security forces routinely trail reporters. Many Jordanian journalists firmly believe that their phones are tapped and mobility is monitored, and therefore fear to spread the word to the outside world.  

 

During the last 10 years of oppression, Jordanians have been queasy, and for good reasons. Jordan is suffering a severe bout of inflation, created by the combination of rising incomes and an insufficient supply of consumer goods. There is also a growing housing shortage for the poor and middle class, and an exponential decline in the provision of social services and quality of the health system. Most ominously of all, Jordan’s $11.2 billion debt is rapidly mounting. Jordanian intellectuals have argued that Jordan is ill-equipped to make the rapid leap--economic reforms--that the king is taking now. How, for instance, could a nation with more than 30% of unemployment cope with the sudden giant increase in all essential consumer’s products such as wheat, eggs, dairy products, rice, ...., etc? How would an economy already on the brink of collapse respond to such a drastic program of shock therapy? How could a quality environment be established for foreign direct investment in our homeland, as a source of capital and technology, while the monarchy regime and its “YES SAYEHDNA (SIR) GOVERNMENT” are practicing massive corruption and violate the rule of law on a daily basis?

 

Contrary to the harsh sentences given to political opponents of the Hashemite Royal Family, there is a policy of not investigating or prosecuting actual corrupt actions of individuals and corporations, particularly those associated with the Royal Family. Nancy Bakir, Minister of Public Sector Reform, stated on May 29, 2009, that more than “30 thousand governments jobs were filled illegally.” A Jordanian official who asked not to be named, told Jordan National Movement (JNM) in Amman, that “the credibility of Jordan suffers from the actions of black sheep in public administration and royal court.” Another Jordanian said “In Germany for instance, the penalty for bribery in business is five years. Why should we not apply the same to Jordan?” A senior USAID official told a JNM official in Washington that “our mobility in Jordan is closely monitored by the regime’s security forces…we are certainly uncomfortable working under such circumstances…” Ordinary Jordanians firmly deem that all this only emphasizes the need for political reforms to go hand in hand with economic reforms. They strongly believe that economic liberalization by itself creates new growth, but also new and immense opportunities for corruption. For instance, secret price-fixing agreements between companies tendering for contracts must be considered as a criminal act punishable with several years in prison.

 

Jordanians must demand major amendments in the constitution such as reducing the authority of King Abdullah II and ask that his role be relegated to that of a titular leader henceforth. The king must listen and act swiftly before it is too late. We must start working toward a “True Housecleaning Strategy” which will permanently restore and refurbish the economic and political landscapes in our homeland. This long-term restructuring strategy will make Jordan more competitive in the global economy. We all must be determined to reshape Jordan by making persistent forward steps toward a robust democracy and greater respect of rule of the law. Otherwise, for the king, this is may be the last time he will celebrate his accession to the throne!

 

Open Letter to U.S. President Barack Obama

February 25, 2009

President Barack Obama

 

 

President Barack Obama

The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear President Obama:

 

In light of the imminent visit of King Abdullah II to the United States, we are writing you this letter concerning the current political, social and economic developments and landscapes in Jordan. Please do not allow King Abdullah II to deceive or sidetrack you! The King says one thing in the presence of foreign leaders, dignitaries and world press and media, but acts very differently back home. For instance, the King is using international forums and other international gatherings for merely public image and propaganda to show his western audience and his foreign interlocutors that he is a real democrat believing in democracy and human rights. Truly, he is a young yet growing thuggish dictator in the heart of the Middle East.

 

New York-based Human Rights Watch (HRW) has recently issued several stern, comprehensive, and accurate reports regarding the most recent human rights abuses in Jordan, conducted directly by King Abdullah II’s regime and his cruel and Gestapo-like intelligence apparatus. This report reinforces other reports issued by Amnesty International in the United Kingdom. The Jordan National Movement published these pictures and brief comments showing human rights abuses committed against journalists, political and opposition figures, and ordinary citizens in Jordan. Freedom House in Washington, DC, issued this 2008 report re: the status of political rights and civil liberties in Jordan. This regime in Amman has failed to adhere to international treaties including international human rights conventions and accords. In addition, since coming to power in 1999, King Abdullah II has failed to deliver on initial pledges to promote democracy and the rule of law.

 

His rule has become increasingly authoritarian and no serious political opposition is permitted to form. His government and the intelligence community manipulate the judiciary, and no independent judges are allowed to operate. According to a report submitted by Mohammad Samed Al-Raqad, the former President of the Judicial Council (recently terminated by the King), to King Abdullah II, on Sunday, May 13, 2007, “the judicial system lacks administrative and financial independence.” The separation of the executive, legislative and judicial powers in Jordan does not exist. These branches are intertwined and subject to direct and constant interference by the King, security and intelligence apparatus, secret police and influential members of the royal family and fat cats in the business community.

 

On Sunday, August 19, 2007, King Abdullah II issued this order: “We, Abdullah II Ben Al Hussein, King of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, in pursuance of Paragraph 1 of Article 34 of the Constitution, order that elections of the House of deputies be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the law.” In other words, the King decided to dissolve Parliament. This statement represents one dimension of the absolute monarchy in Jordan. King Abdullah II decides everything and anything: At his own pleasure, he appoints and sacks Members of Parliament, Prime Ministers, Senators, Ambassadors, Supreme Court Judges, and high-ranking officials, intelligence and military commanders, and runs Parliament and Municipality elections that are tribal and full of fraud. Similar to previous national elections, future Parliament and Municipality elections will be held based on the one-person, one-vote system, a tribal and ethnic-based voting system aims to customize and recruit unprofessional and pro absolute monarchy legislators whose main concerns lie with personal interests, bribery and favoritism. This impartial and fake system has been widely criticized on the national and international stages. Further, on January 25, 2009, former Prime Minister Ahmed Obeidat stated, “How can we respect and trust the current Members of Parliament who say publically that they have won their seats via vote-buying?”

 

As far as the media is concerned, the regime in Jordan displays essential features of an authoritarian media system. All broadcast media is controlled and manipulated by the appointed government and royal court circles. Strict control over Jordan Radio and Television is exercised through the General Intelligence Department (GID), which also oversees print media, and can act against any perceived dissension: incarceration, employment termination, and newspaper closure or suspension. Attorney Saleh Al-Armouti, President of the Jordan Bar Association, and Attorney Hatim Al-Ghoeiri, former judge at King Abdullah II’s Military Court, stated on December 20, 2008 that “more than 100 cases per year of Italit Alisan (lashing at the King) are filed by the military prosecutors.”

 

On Monday, November 10, 2008, King Abdullah II, the ultimate decision maker in the country, told chief editors of Jordanian daily newspaper at a meeting held in the Bab Al Urdun Palace, “in Jordan there will be no detention of any journalist for carrying out their duty.” This is hypocritical and misleading statement aimed to misinform and mislead worldwide human rights and press organizations as well as the international community. On January 22, 2009, Ahamd Al-Tamimi, a journalist in the Al-Ghaad daily newspaper was abducted by three security officers in Irbid, north of Jordan, and beaten up severely…these security agents told Mr. Al-Tamimi that the did this because of his daily reporting and writings in this newspaper. On January 9, 2009, Al-Darak Forces, established recently by King Abdullah II, who has put its operation orders in the hands of the corrupt Minister of Interior (recently terminated), Eid Al-Fayez, cracked its whip and baton on the head, face, and body of Yasser Abu Hlalah, a daily columnist at Al-Ghad daily newspaper and Chief of Al-Jazeera TV Satellite Station in Amman, during a demonstration held in Amman against the Israeli invasion of Gaza. Hlalah was rushed to the hospital and went under urgent surgery to stitch several cuts in his head and face. Members of this TV station also sustained injuries and several cuts on their bodies. On December 23, 2008, King Abdullah II’s GID detained two journalists, Ahmed Al-Tayeb and Ziad Al-Tahrawi, from Al-Baida newspaper, for reporting on mismanagement and corruption at King Hussein’s Medical City. In March 2007, King Abdullah II ratified the Press and Publications law that abolishes imprisonment for journalists; however, he refused to amend the Penal Code which gives carte blanche to the unelected government (appointed by the King), Military Court and GID to jail and imprison journalists and human rights activists.

 

The national and international status of Jordan’s economy, public health and labor rights are sliding backward. Jordan is ranked 53rd on the Transparency International’s 2007 Corruption Perception Index. Dr. Rood Rihani, a Medical Specialist in Pediatrics, stated on February 17, 2008 that children cancers make up 10 percent of all cancerous cases in the Kingdom. According to Dr. Rihani, “300 Jordanian children are diagnosed with cancer every year.” The International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) current reports on Jordan’s economy stated that the increase in foreign debt in Jordan exceeded 4 percent of its GDP. Recently, the World Bank ranked Jordan 104th as a safe and quality investment environment in the world. The exponential rise in national and foreign debts is staggering. The total debt currently stands at $11.2 billion. From December 2007 to May 2008 alone, the national debt increased by $1.8 billion. On July 30, 2008, Dr. Fahad Al-Fanek, the general manager of and a columnist for the state-run Jordanian daily Al-Rai, wrote “the inflation rate is much more than the 8-9 percent range suggested by the Minster of Finance and the IMF’s experts…this poses a serious threat to the economic and social stability of the country.” On August 31, 2008, Member of Parliament Nariman Al-Roosan asked the government to investigate a serious corruption and human rights case, published by the US-based Chicago Tribune newspaper, accusing Jordanian businessmen and high-ranking officials, including relatives of Bassem Awadallah, the former Chief of the Hashemite Royal Court, of human trafficking. Further, drug use and  trafficking is rising exponentially during King Abdullah II’s rule: Jordan’s Anti-Drugs Department recently reported that the number of drugs/substances abused cases, such as the use of cocaine, hashish, marijuana, heroin, and opium, approximately quadrupled: from 2585 (between 1990-1997) to 9564 (1998-2005).

 

The security apparatus’ dirty hands and spies are everywhere, conducting despicable business on behalf and under the directions and watchful eyes of King Abdullah II and members of the royal family. Like the King, the security commanders, including the Chief of the GID, are above the law, and they have absolute authority to detain any person regardless of any legal requirements and ramifications, select and endorse ministers, senators, members of parliament and high rank King officials; interfere in municipal and parliament elections and passport renewals; conduct and practice wide-range favoritism, and terrorize public employees. For instance, on December 9, 2008, Aamer Ahmed died at Wadi Al-Seer District’s Police Station due to a severe beating by unidentified police officers. Similar to several other cases of police brutality, this case has never been investigated nor prosecuted in the court of law. On February 1, 2009, Attorney Abdul Karim Al-Shridah, Chairman of Prisons and Jails Committee at the Arab Human Rights Organization in Amman, stated (after recent visit to Al-Jwaidah prison), that “several prisoners, specifically Firas Said Al-Rifair, Muath Brizat, and Samer Abu Arab, told him that they have been subjected to severe physical beatings (including sodomy) and torture by security officers and prison guards…these prisoners showed me the marks of this systematic physical abuse…these are absolutely inhuman practices…”

 

It was absolutely shameful and ludicrous to hear Queen Rania, the wife of King Abdullah, stating on Thursday, September 21, 2006, during a conference organized by Clinton Global Initiative in New York City, that the “only way to create a stable and secure world is to address global injustices, specifically in the Arab world,” while she and her husband, King Abdullah, and members of the royal family are standing in the way by not allowing the Jordanian people to elect a representative government! Queen Rania has been playing significant overt and covert political roles in the daily functions of the unelected government. She is appointing ministers and high-level officials, interfering, dictating and steering the executive branch of the state. Queen Rania is assuming this unconstitutional role despite opposition from the great majority of Jordanians. She is responsible for promoting corruption and nepotism in the appointed government and royal court. While Jordanians live an impoverished life, Queen Rania spends a huge portion of the country’s resources on private jets, new palaces, lavish parties, royal receptions and her very expensive fashions. Jordanians live under a cruel dictatorial regime that refuses dialogue with the opposition (a “my way or the highway” kind of mentality), imposes its will on the people, uses fear and intimidation by throwing dissidents in jail, changes governments as it pleases, and resorts to bribes to enlist supporters and appoint them in key governmental and royal court positions. On January 31, 2008, the Honorable Toujan Al-Faisal made it very clear that King Abdullah II was behind the government’s decision to ban her from running for previous Parliament elections. To prevent and convince the Honorable Al-Faisal not to run for these elections, King Abdullah II offered her three new Mercedes cars, one for her and the other two for her two daughters, a luxury single family home in a posh area in Western Amman, and a blank check for unlimited cash money. The offer was delivered by Saad Kheir, former Director of the corrupt General Intelligence Department (GID). Also, the Honorable Toujan Al-Faisal, former MP, stated that a member of the royal family informed her that King Abdullah II ordered his security apparatus to prevent her from running. The King said, “do whatever it takes…do not underestimate her this time…” On Tuesday, October 9, 2007, the thuggish and bloody dictator King Abdullah II sentenced the scholar and former MP Dr. Al-Abbadi to 2 years in prison for speaking up against corruption and human rights abuses in Jordan.

 

Queen Rania is also upstaging her husband in foreign affairs. On December 31, 2008, Queen Rania told Al-Jazeera TV Station, “the Arab diplomatic wheel has not been  working for many decades…We, the Arabs, have failed to convey our voice to the world’s decision makers [re: the Arab-Israeli conflict], despite the justice and legitimacy of the Palestinian cause….” Many domestic, regional and foreign observers in foreign affairs laughed at these naive comments that prove the queen’s utter lack of understanding of the basic principles of foreign and international affairs. Jordan is now without even a Crown Prince. Queen Rania, a Jordanian of Palestinian origin, has pressured her husband King Abdullah II to terminate Prince Hamza on November 28, 2004, son of Queen Noor (the American-Jordanian wife of the late King Hussein), to pave the way for her son (Prince Hussein), to take over as heir to the throne as soon as he becomes 18 years old, a foolish step that will raise eyes brows in Israel and amongst Eastern Jordanians.

 

As taxpayers, Jordanians are misinformed and blocked from accessing critical information related to the state budget, monetary policies of lenders from foreign countries, and even basic information, such as the annual income of members of the royal family. No one in Jordan, including members of Parliament, knows about or is even allowed to discuss the budget of the royal court. Since he assumed power in 1999, the king increased the size of the royal court staff from 300 to 3000 employees. The aim for this increase is to have two governments: One for public services and the second to make strategic decisions without even consulting with Parliament, a clear violation of the current constitution. King Abdullah II lacks command of the Arabic language; he speaks Arabic with a heavy accent and has never spoken at or attended an Arabic press conference or delivered a lengthy speech in Arabic. In public meetings, King Abdullah II asks the appointed Prime Minister, to answer questions on his behalf, due to his poor Arabic speaking skills. In addition, the King and members of the royal family spend most of their time traveling abroad spending millions of dollars without documenting their expenses or making them public. They do not pay taxes, and their annual and sources of income are unknown to the public or appointed government.

 

JNM stands firm to defend the rights of the people of Jordan to effect change and make genuine and speedy constitutional changes. On January 19, 2009, the Chairman of the National Initiative for Reforms, Rhail Gharibah, announced that “more than 100 national figures are now together to establish a wide national front to change the current absolute monarchy to constitutional system via peaceful and democratic means…” King Abdullah II himself declared on March 15, 2005, in an interview with Peter Jennings of ABC news that he would embrace and support such a system. Since this famous interview, the King has been dragging his feet to implement long-awaited reforms. His excuse is that the Palestinian-Israeli conflict must be resolved first! Why Israel, which is very similar to Jordan in terms of geo-political and demographic dimensions, is a full-fledged democratic state?

 

As far as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is concerned, we firmly believe that the solution of this conflict is either establishing an independent Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza or annexing the Palestinian territories to Jordan and Egypt respectively. If the latter solution is determined by the United States and the International community, then a genuine democracy must be established in the new state “the United Republic.” Simply put, the successful Iraqi model of democracy or the unity of Northern Yemen and Southern Yemen can be applied to this new Republic: A presidential council, headed by Eastern Jordanian, and comprised of members who represent the large Palestinian community (majority) and other minorities. The elected Prime Minister is of Palestinian origin, and the Speaker of Parliament and President of the Senate are Eastern Jordanian and Jordanian of Palestinian descent respectively.

 

The royal family in Jordan must understand that we will not relinquish our total commitment to these essential reforms. JNM will seek every single diplomatic avenue and peaceful means to inform the international community of the current and future exacerbating circumstances in our homeland, Jordan. As stated by Professor Marc Lynch in an article, written by Simon Tisdall on Tuesday, November 29, 2005, in the UK-based Guardian Newspaper, “After six years in power, King Abdullah had little to show for his frequent speeches about reform. His tenure had been characterized by a steady decline in freedoms.” Today, these reforms are absolutely nonexistent. According to a scientific survey conducted by the University of Jordan’s Centre for Strategic Studies (CSS) and published on December 27, 2008, “Approximately 80 per cent of respondents expressed fear of criticizing the government in public, up from 78 per cent last year.” JNM will work consistently and wholeheartedly to reverse the regime’s absolute military-style of governance.

 

To avoid generating new evil terrorists and suppressed people, spread peace, economic prosperity and lasting tranquility in Jordan and the Middle East region at large, we urge your administration to work hand in hand with Jordanian opposition leaders, leaders of civil society, and the Jordanian National Movement to carry out this long-awaited change swiftly, peacefully and democratically!

 

Cc:

U.S. Vice President (via Chief of Staff)

French President, French Embassy, Amman, Jordan

British Prime Minister, Embassy of Britain, Amman, Jordan

Japanese Prime Minister, Embassy of Japan, Amman, Jordan

Russian President, Embassy of Russia, Amman, Jordan

Chinese President, Embassy of China, Amman, Jordan

Prime Minister of Canada, Canadian Embassy, Amman, Jordan

George Mitchelll, President Obama’s Special Envoy to the Middle East

Human Rights Watch, New York, U.S.A.

Human Rights First, Washington, D.C.

Amnesty International, United Kingdom

Freedom House, Washington, D.C.

U.S. Dept. of State, Jordan Desk

U.S. Congress

European Union

United Nations

The International Federation of Journalists, Brussels, Belgium

European Federation of Journalists, Brussels, Belgium

Committee To Protect Journalists, New York

The U.S. Press, the International Press, and the Arab & Arab-American Press

Printer Freindly Copy of this Statement

Guerrilla Journalism in Jordan

 صحيفة الغد تستنكر الاعتداء على الزميل التميميJNM, Amman-Jordan (Sunday, January 25, 2009): Al-Darak Forces, established recently by King Abdullah II (see above picture) who has put its operation orders in the hands of the corrupt Minister of Interior, Eid Al-Fayez (known in Jordan by the name Eid Al-Fasid), cracked its whip and batons on the head, face, and body of Mr. Yasser Abu Hlalah, a daily columnist at Al-Ghad daily newspaper and Chief of Al-Jazeera TV Satellite Station in Amman, during a demonstration held in Amman, on January 9, 2009, against the Israeli invasion of Gaza. Mr. Hlalah was rushed to the hospital and went under urgent surgery to stitch several cuts in his head and face (see above a picture of Mr. Abu Hilalah after surgery). Members of this TV Station also sustained injuries and several cuts in their bodies.

On Thursday, January 22, 2009, Ahmad Al-Tamimi, a reporter and journalist in Al-Ghad daily newspaper, was beat up and kicked severely in the northern governance of Irbid (see the bottom picture). The Jordan National Movement (JNM) learned that the three attackers belong to King Abdullah II’s Beat up Squad, part of Al-Darak Forces. They abducted Mr. Al-Tamimi from his car and then dragged him to an isolated farm…while they were beating him, the attackers shouted, “we are doing this so you won’t write against the regime and its government.” Once again, King Abdullah II proves to be, not just as a nasty human rights abuser, but an evil terrorist, who uses the iron fist to scare and terrorize human rights activists, journalists and opposition to his thuggish and dictatorial regime…a similar draconian technique used by the then terrorist Udday Saddam Hussein in Iraq. This tragic incident was condemned by several human rights activists in Jordan, Al-Ghad newspaper, the Jordanian Press Association, and Jordan-based Center for Defending Freedom of Journalists.

 

These draconian assaults came after promises declared on Monday, November 10, 2008, by King Abdullah II, the ultimate decision maker in the country, that “in Jordan there will be no detention of any journalist for carrying out their duty.” After these barbaric and reprehensible incidents, it’s very difficult to have sympathy for the Hashemite tyrant…these tragic actions are now part of a dark record of terror in modern Jordanian history.

 

The Jordan National Movement (JNM) condemns these crimes in the strongest terms. Such shameful incidents must not be replicated under any circumstances. We call upon all worldwide defenders of human rights to do everything within their power to focus upon, censure and condemn human rights violations by King Abdullah II and his Gestapo-like security forces.

Human Rights Watch Blasts Rampant Human Rights Abuses in King Abdullah II's Kingdom of Corruption

JNM, Amman, Jordan (Wednesday, October 8, 2008): New York-based Human Rights Watch blasted King Abdullah II's brutal regime today for rampant human rights abuses conducted by Gesapo-like security forces, such as Mokhabrat or the General Intelligence Department (GID), Estikhbarat (Military Intelligence), Amen Wikai (Preventive Security) and Al-Darak security forces…Below is Human Rights Watch's grisly report

The Jordan National Movement (JNM) will publish soon an executive report that supports Human Rights Watch’s findings and outline several recent corruption cases and human rights abuses conducted by King Abdullah II’s thuggish regime….this report is supported by pictures and documentations… please stay tuned…

HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH

Jordan: Torture in Prisons

Routine and Widespread Reforms Fail to Tackle Abuse, Impunity Persists

(Amman, October 8, 2008) – Jordan should end routine and widespread torture in its prisons, Human Rights Watch said in a new report released today. Human Rights Watch called on the government to overhaul mechanisms for investigating, disciplining and prosecuting abusers, and in particular to transfer prosecutor’s investigations into prison abuse from police to civilian prosecutors.  

The 95-page report, “Torture and Impunity in Jordan’s Prisons: Reforms Fail to Tackle Widespread Abuse,” documents credible allegations of ill-treatment, often amounting to torture, from 66 out of 110 prisoners interviewed at random in 2007 and 2008, and in each of the seven of Jordan’s 10 prisons visited. Human Rights Watch’s evidence suggests that five prison directors personally participated in torturing detainees.  
 
“Torture in Jordan’s prison system is widespread even two years after King Abdullah called for reforms to stop it once and for all,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director at Human Rights Watch. “The mechanisms for preventing torture by holding torturers accountable are simply not working.”  
 
The most common forms of torture include beatings with cables and sticks and the suspension by the wrists from metal grates for hours at a time, during which guards flog a defenseless prisoner. Prison guards also torture prisoners for perceived infractions of prison rules. Human Rights Watch found evidence that at times Islamists accused or convicted of crimes against national security (Tanzimat) were punished en masse.  
 
Prison officials say beatings and other ill-treatment are isolated incidents and that a prison reform program initiated in 2006 is improving prison conditions and accountability for abuse. Human Rights Watch’s research shows that while the reform program may well be improving the chief areas of its focus – health services, overcrowding, visitation, and recreation facilities – impunity for physical abuse remains the norm.  
 
In October 2007, an amendment to the Penal Code made torture a crime for the first time, and in early 2008, the Public Security Directorate (PSD) assigned prosecutors to investigate abuses at seven prisons. But to date there have been no prosecutions under that law.  
 
In February 2008, the PSD allowed the National Center for Human Rights to set up an office inside Swaqa prison. However, critical reporting about a prison riot there in April 2008 led the PSD to stop its cooperation with the center.  
 
“Jordan has made some attempts to address the problem of torture in prison, but the bottom line is that the measures have been insufficient, and torture persists as a consequence,” Whitson said.  
 
Two separate incidents involving the torture and abuse of large groups of detainees highlight failures in accountability. Despite extensive evidence that guards in Juwaida and Swaqa prisons tortured Islamist prisoners following a successful escape by two Islamist prisoners from Juwaida in June 2007, the Jordanian authorities failed to launch any investigation. In a third incident, the PSD, which directs security agencies including the prison service, did launch an extensive investigation into events surrounding the prison riot and fire on April 14, 2008 at Muwaqqar prison that left three prisoners dead. The investigators did not prosecute a guard who prisoners alleged had tortured some of them just prior to the fire, included some who died in it. An independent non-judicial investigation by the National Center for Human Rights found ill-treatment at the heart of the prison riot. Despite this evidence, the investigation concluded that no official had done anything wrong.  
 
Part of the problem lies in the authority of prison officials to discipline internally, which is used as way of avoiding formal prosecution of torturers. For example, in 2007, while the PSD investigated 19 allegations of torture across Jordan, referring six to court for prosecution, the directors of three prisons, Muwaqqar, Qafqafa, and Swaqa, told Human Rights Watch that they had internally disciplined six guards for abuse without involving the PSD. Prison directors in Jordan have authority to settle abuse cases as “misdemeanors,” including ill-treatment, without resorting to the Police Court.  
 
“The PSD’s reluctance to prosecute and punish torturers within its ranks stems from a misguided desire to preserve the reputation of the prison service,” Whitson said. “Instead, protecting guards who torture from prosecution tarnishes the image of the entire profession, including those guards who fulfill their duties without resorting to torture and abuse of prisoners.”  
 
Furthermore, Human Rights Watch pointed out that it is police prosecutors and police judges who are responsible for investigating, prosecuting and trying their fellow officers for prison abuses, including torture, in the Police Court. Grievances officials, who investigate prison abuses, referred cases for prosecutions only in a small number of cases where there was overwhelming evidence.  
 
Even where the government has prosecuted some egregious cases of torture, the Police Court’s verdicts have been flawed. In one case, the Police Court sentenced former Swaqa prison director Majid al-Rawashda to a fine of JOD 120 (around US$180) for ordering and participating in the beating of 70 prisoners in August 2007. The court found 12 other guards who had participated in the beatings not guilty because they were “following orders.” The court sentenced prison guards who had beaten Firas Zaidan to death in Aqaba prison in May 2007 to two-and-a-half years in prison. The court also reduced to two-and-a-half years the sentence of guards who had beaten Abdullah Mashaqba to death in Juwaida prison in 2004 because they were “in the prime of their youth.”  
 
“The police and prison service cannot credibly investigate itself,” said Whitson. “Civilian prosecutors and judges should take over all investigations of prison abuse to end impunity for torturers and begin to provide redress for victims of torture.”  
 
Since beginning its prison reform program in 2006, Jordan has sought international advice on improving prison conditions. The New York-based Kerik Group provided training and advised on prison management, equipment, and new construction, including a super-maximum security prison with 240 solitary confinement-only cells to be opened in late 2008. Currently, Austria’s Ministry of Justice is in an EU-sponsored “twinning project” with the PSD to reform the penitentiary system.  
 
Human Rights Watch calls on Jordan’s donors to address the widespread torture, and to condition part of their assistance on the establishment of independent investigation and prosecution mechanisms.  
 

Freedom House Blasts King Abdullah II's Abusive Regime: July 2, 2008 Report

Jordan (2008)

Capital: Amman

Population: 5,700,000

Political Rights Score: 5
Civil Liberties Score: 4
Status: Partly Free

Overview

 

Jordan’s parliament passed new legislation governing political parties in 2007, but key changes to the electoral law were not enacted, leaving reforms incomplete ahead of parliamentary elections in November. The Islamist opposition fared poorly in the balloting and accused the government of massive fraud, continuing an exchange of increasingly hostile rhetoric that had dominated the campaign period. Meanwhile, Jordan continued to face strains due to the influx of Iraqi refugees.

The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, known as Transjordan until 1950, was established as a League of Nations mandate under British control in 1921 and won full independence in 1946. Following the assassination of King Abdullah in 1951, the crown passed briefly to his mentally unstable eldest son, Talal, and then to his grandson, Hussein. King Hussein’s turbulent 46-year reign featured a massive influx of Palestinian refugees (who now comprise a majority of the population), the loss of all territory west of the Jordan River in 1967, and numerous assassinations and coup attempts by Palestinian and Arab nationalists. Although the 1952 constitution provided for a directly elected parliament, political parties were banned in 1956, and the parliament was either suspended entirely or emasculated by government intervention in the electoral process. While political and civil liberties remained tightly restricted, Hussein proved adept at co-opting—rather than killing, jailing, or exiling—his political opponents. After economic austerity measures in the late 1980s sparked rioting and internal pressure for greater freedom and representation, the government launched a rapid process of political liberalization and progressively eased restrictions on civil liberties. However, the reform process ground to a halt in the mid-1990s and suffered some reversals.

 

By the time of Hussein’s death in 1999 and the ascension of his son, Abdullah, the kingdom again faced severe economic problems. The expected “peace dividend” from Jordan’s 1994 peace treaty with Israel had failed to improve conditions for most of the population. To deal with a crippling public debt and 27 percent unemployment, Abdullah began major economic reforms and signed one of the Arab world’s first free-trade agreements with the United States. Meanwhile, additional restrictions on the media, public protests, and civil society activity were imposed after Islamists, leftists, and Jordanians of Palestinian descent mounted demonstrations in sympathy with the 2000 uprising in the West Bank and Gaza. The protesters demanded the annulment of Jordan’s peace treaty with Israel.

 

In 2001, Abdullah dissolved the parliament, postponed elections scheduled for November, and replaced elected municipal councils with state-appointed local committees. For more than two years, he ruled by decree, issuing more than 200 “temporary laws” that weakened due process and restricted freedom of expression and assembly.

 

Although the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 further inflamed popular opposition to the kingdom’s foreign policy, Abdullah quickly moved to relax restrictions on freedom of expression and allowed reasonably free and transparent, though not fair, parliamentary and municipal elections that year. In an informal understanding with the palace, dissident leftist and Islamist groups gained limited freedom of expression and political participation, and agreed to curtail their agitation against Jordan’s pro-U.S. alignment. This arrangement was contingent on continued economic progress, which was driven by a new infusion of “oil grants” from the Arab Gulf states and a dramatic increase in assistance from the United States.

 

Terrorist bombings struck Amman in November 2005, and Abdullah replaced his security advisers, dissolved the Senate, and appointed a new cabinet in 2006. In August of that year, the parliament approved a new antiterrorism law that criminalized financing, interacting with, and recruiting for any terrorist group. It also gave military courts jurisdiction over terrorism cases, and permitted surveillance of terrorism suspects and the detention of suspects for up to 30 days.

 

Also in 2006, the government released its National Agenda reform plan, which among other provisions called for the abolition of laws that discriminate against women and an update to association laws. The plan faced opposition from entrenched interests and a skeptical public that questioned the government’s commitment to implement it. There was progress in 2007 on new legislation governing political parties, but essential electoral reforms continued to stall.

 

In the run-up to municipal and parliamentary elections in July and November 2007, respectively, there was an increase in hostile rhetoric between the government and the Islamic Action Front (IAF), the main opposition movement. Security forces arrested nine IAF members between May and June for “threatening national security.” The IAF officially withdrew from the municipal polls on election day but won 2 out of the 965 contested seats. The party accused the government of using security personnel to manipulate the vote, while the government accused the Islamists of trying to undermine the elections.

 

The majority of parliament seats went to progovernment independents in the November 2007 parliamentary elections. Only 6 out of 22 IAF candidates won seats. The Amman-based al-Urdun al-Jadid Research Center reported significant electoral irregularities including vote buying and the use of improper identification by voters, though independent observers generally declared the elections free and fair. The authorities arrested two people for trying to buy votes. A new cabinet was sworn in on November 25, 2007, that included 13 first-time ministers and 4 women.

 

Jordan has been struggling to accommodate the huge influx of Iraqis fleeing violence in their home country. The authorities initially welcomed the mostly middle-class Iraqi refugees, who provided a boost to the Jordanian economy, but a massive increase in the number of Iraqis with lesser means has placed a strain on Jordanian resources and caused integration problems. Jordan has recently begun refusing Iraqi refugees at the border.

Politcal Rights and Civil Liberties

Jordan is not an electoral democracy. King Abdullah II holds broad executive powers, appoints the prime minister and cabinet, and may dissolve the National Assembly and dismiss the cabinet at his discretion. The 110-seat lower house of the National Assembly, elected through universal adult suffrage, may approve, reject, or amend legislation proposed by the cabinet, but is limited in its ability to initiate legislation. It cannot enact laws without the assent of the 55-seat upper house, or Senate, which is appointed by the king. Members of both houses serve four-year terms. Regional governors are appointed by the central government.

 

The electoral system is heavily skewed toward the monarchy’s traditional support base. Voters are restricted to choosing a single candidate, as opposed to a party slate, in the 45 multiseat parliamentary districts. This favors tribal and family ties over political and ideological affiliations. In addition, rural districts with populations of Transjordanian origin are overrepresented relative to urban districts, where most Jordanians of Palestinian descent reside. Activists have repeatedly called for a new electoral law based on proportional representation, but the government did not act on its pledges to reform the law before the 2007 elections.

 

The parliament did pass a controversial political parties law in 2007, though it did not take effect until after the November parliamentary elections. It raised from 50 to 500 the number of members necessary for a party to register, and increased the number of districts from which those members must be drawn. Existing parties that failed to meet the new criteria would be banned. However, an independent judicial body, rather than the Interior Ministry, would grant party licenses. State funding would be distributed according to parliamentary representation, and parties would continue to be penalized for receiving foreign funding. The overall purpose of the law was to reduce fragmentation in politics, but reformists expressed concern that it could be used to limit legitimate opposition.

 

Parliament also passed a municipalities law in February 2007, stipulating that all mayors and local councils be elected, with the exception of Amman, where half of the council members would continue to be appointed by the central government. Under the existing system, half of all municipal council members had been appointed. The new measure also reserved a seat quota of 20 percent for women, and the age of eligible voters was reduced from 19 to 18.

 

Corruption persists in the executive and legislative branches of government, though the authorities have made progress in combating it in recent years. In September 2006, the parliament approved anticorruption legislation that would create a six-member commission, appointed by the prime minister, tasked with investigating graft. The government is sensitive to public charges of corruption. In July 2007, former lawmaker Ahmed al-Abbadi was charged in the State Security Court (SSC) with belonging to an illegal organization after he sent an e-mail to a U.S. senator accusing the Jordanian government of corruption. In October, Abbadi was convicted and sentenced to two years in prison for undermining the country’s reputation, membership in an illegitimate organization, and distributing illegal pamphlets. Jordan was ranked 53 out of 180 countries surveyed in Transparency International’s 2007 Corruption Perceptions Index.

 

Freedom of expression is sometimes restricted. Vaguely worded legislation criminalizes criticism of the royal family, slander of government officials, and speech that harms foreign relations, enflames religious sensitivities, or undermines the state’s reputation. In March 2007, the parliament took long-awaited steps to amend the press and publications law, abolishing imprisonment as a penalty for press offenses. However, reporters still face fines of up to $40,000. Other changes to the law eliminated previous censorship rules for books published in Jordan, but censors retained the power to ban imported volumes.

 

The government has issued several private broadcasting licenses, but most broadcast news media remain under state control. Satellite dishes are widespread, giving most Jordanians access to foreign media. Jordan’s first private television station, ATV, was approved in late 2005 and was set to launch in early 2007, but was delayed because of financial troubles and wrangling over the station’s administration. Plans for a new satellite station based in Amman were finalized in October 2007. There are dozens of private newspapers and magazines, but the government has broad powers to close print publications. In April 2007, authorities banned an edition of Al-Majd to suppress a story about a “secret plan” to oust the Hamas-led Palestinian government. Also in April, authorities seized a tape of an interview with Prince Hassan bin Talal—the king’s uncle and a former heir to the throne—by Qatar-based Al-Jazeera television.

 

Authorities are routinely tipped off about potentially offensive articles by informers at printing presses, and editors frequently come under pressure to remove such material. Intelligence agents often telephone journalists with warnings about their writing. While the government denies restricting access to the internet, and in fact actively promotes it, websites airing critical views have been blocked in the past.

 

Islam is the state religion. Sunni Muslims constitute 92 percent of the population, but Christians and Jews are recognized as religious minorities and allowed to worship freely. Baha’is and Druze are allowed to practice their faiths, but are not officially recognized. The government appoints Islamic clergy, pays their salaries, and monitors sermons at mosques, where political activity is banned. A recent law regulating mosques requires mosques to require preachers to obtain written government permission to lead services or teach the Koran. Unauthorized preachers would face a month in prison and a fine. The parliament in 2006 approved a measure that allows only state-appointed councils to issue religious edicts, or fatwas, and makes it illegal to criticize these fatwas.

 

Academic freedom is generally respected. Jordanians are free to openly discuss political and societal developments, though there have reports of a heavy intelligence presence on some university campuses. In May 2007, 14 university professors affiliated with the opposition IAF party were dismissed from the University of Zarqa. The university president maintained that they were fired for academic reasons amid departmental restructuring.

 

Freedom of assembly is heavily restricted. The Law on General Assemblies bans public demonstrations lacking written authorization from the regional governor. The 2001 Law on Public Gatherings broadly defines public gatherings as any meeting between two persons, including those in a private home or office, and requires organizers to attain advance permission from governors who have the authority to prohibit them. Opposition groups have complained that most of their requests are denied. Freedom of association is limited. While dozens of licensed nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) operate freely, the Ministry of Social Development occasionally withholds licenses from NGOs deemed subversive. There is a prohibition on NGOs participating in political activity. Workers have the right to bargain collectively but must receive government permission to strike. More than 30 percent of the workforce is organized into 17 unions. The government has threatened to dissolve the Professional Associations Council (PAC), which has mounted protests in the past, and a draft law barring professional associations from engaging in politics is awaiting decision in parliament. In December 2007, the government removed the leadership of two large NGOs, the General Union of Voluntary Societies and the Islamic Center Society, accusing them of financial impropriety.

 

The judiciary is subject to executive influence through the Justice Ministry and the Higher Judiciary Council, whose members are appointed by the king. A number of judicial reforms were under discussion in 2007, though there has been no progress in efforts to establish a constitutional court. While most trials in civilian courts are open and procedurally sound, the State Security Court (SSC) may close its proceedings to the public. A temporary law promulgated in 2001 allows the prime minister to refer any case to the SSC and denies the right of appeal to people convicted by the SSC of misdemeanors, which can carry short prison sentences.

 

Jordanian citizens enjoy little protection from arbitrary arrest and detention. Under the constitution, suspects may be detained for up to 48 hours without a warrant and up to 10 days without formal charges being filed; courts routinely grant prosecutors 15-day extensions of this deadline. Even these protections are denied to suspects referred to the SSC, who are often held in lengthy pretrial detention and refused access to legal counsel until just before trial. The UN Special Rapporteur on torture found in 2006 that “torture is systematically practiced” by the General Intelligence Department (GID), which interrogates suspects to obtain confessions in SSC cases. Nearly every defendant tried by the SSC has claimed they were tortured.

 

Prison conditions are poor, and inmates are reportedly subject to severe beatings and other abuse by guards. A 2007 report by a coalition of Jordanian Islamists, professional syndicates, and Arab human rights organizations highlighted overcrowding and inadequate facilities. Capital punishment is legal, but the government announced in 2006 that it would no longer be imposed for a number of offenses, such as drug-related crimes. Death sentences continued to be issued for violent crimes and terrorism-related offenses.

 

Jordanians of Palestinian descent face discrimination in employment by the government and the military, and in admission to universities. Labor laws do not protect foreign workers. In July 2007, Jordan established new child-labor guidelines to abide by International Labor Organization conventions. Employment of children under 16 is illegal, but the rule is frequently violated. Freedom of movement and travel is generally respected, and there were no reports in 2006 of mothers being prevented from travelling alone with children.

 

Women enjoy equal political rights but face legal discrimination in matters involving inheritance and divorce—which fall under the jurisdiction of Sharia (Islamic law) courts—and child custody. Government pensions and social security benefits also favor men. However, new provisions within the National Agenda reform program aim to change this and abolish laws that are discriminatory toward women. Marital rape is not illegal, and there are no laws protecting women from domestic violence. A 2002 temporary law granting women the right to initiate divorce proceedings has been rejected repeatedly by the legislature, but remains in effect. Although women constitute only 14 percent of the workforce, the government has made efforts to increase the number of women in the civil service.

 

Women are guaranteed a quota of six seats in the parliament and, under the 2007 municipalities law, 20 percent of the seats in municipal councils. Female participation in the latest elections was high. Though women have been judges since 1996, Ihsan Barakat was appointed as the first woman appeals court judge in May 2007. Article 98 of the penal code allows for lenient treatment of those who commit a crime in a “state of fit or fury” resulting from an unlawful or dangerous act on the part of the victim. In practice, this provision is often applied to benefit men who commit “honor crimes”—the murder or attempted murder of women by relatives for alleged sexual misconduct. In some cases, an administrative governor may incarcerate a woman for her “own protection” without benefit of due process; some women have spent years in prison because they have no safe alternative.

U.S. State Department's 2007 Human Rights Report Outlines King Abdullah II's Human Rights Abuses

JNM, Amman, Jordan (Friday, March 14, 2008): The salient chapter in the U.S. State Department’s 2007 human rights report is about King Abdullah II, and it makes grim reading. The absolute monarchical authorities have done nothing less than silence all public dissent. Some of this was done no doubt to keep control in choppy political waters. Another likely consideration was to show American critics that the Hashemite family does not shrink from sticking a finger in their eye.

The United States government must acknowledge that its policy of constructive engagement with this rogue regime in Amman had so far failed to bring progress on human rights. The United States government believes that social impulses, economic change and the availability of foreign information would inevitably increase the spirit of liberty over time in Jordan, but the Jordan National Movement (JNM) firmly believe that this no more than a reassuring theory, and it will take years to prove out. It carries the implication that outsiders can meanwhile back off from pressing human rights. This would be a tragic mistake. The results of either engaging or retreating are hard to predict. No matter, Americans must be true to themselves. That need not mean neglecting every other consideration, but it does mean speaking out on things that matter.

King Abdullah II is said to be confronting a harsh choice between suffering penalties for its authoritarian ways and opening up political space for internal challenge. But this is precisely the dilemma that friends of democracy ought to be pleased to see King Abdullah II face. The current dictatorial regime in Amman may not be happy about it, but over time the Jordanian people ought to benefit from even ragged movement toward fairness and the rule of law.

Items appeared in this report concerning Dr. Al-Abbadi’s case:

“For example, on October 9, the State Security Court convicted and sentenced former member of parliament (MP) Ahmad Abbadi to two years' imprisonment on charges of undermining the country's reputation, membership in an illegitimate organization, and distributing illegal pamphlets. On April 30, Abbadi published an open letter to a foreign official on a foreign Web site accusing senior Jordanian officials of corruption, challenging the government's commitment to reform, and criticizing the government's respect for human rights. Abbadi named the minister of interior personally in the letter. On May 3, the minister of interior filed a personal complaint alleging slander. At year's end, Abbadi also faced charges of slander, libel, and misuse of electronic media in the Amman Court of Conciliation.”

“On May 11, ammonnews.net reported that authorities prevented Al-Jazeera journalists from covering a rally in Amman supporting former MP Abbadi, and that they were instructed to stop posting comments related to Abbadi's detention on ammonnews.net.”

Human Rights Watch Condemns King Abdullah II's Cruel Regime

HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH

Human Rights Watch Letter to

Jordanian Prime Minister Dahabi on

the Draft NGO and Public Assembly

Laws

New York, June 30, 2008  
 
Eng. Nader Dahabi  
Prime Minister  
Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan  
 
Dear Prime Minister,  
 
We write to urge you to withdraw the current draft laws on charitable societies (NGO Law) and public gatherings (Assembly Law) from consideration of the House of Deputies and the House of Senators respectively because they are in clear violation of international human rights standards.

The NGO Law treats NGOs as an extension of government, subjecting their establishment, financing and activities to detailed government control. It would make it almost impossible for any NGO that attempts to effect and critically monitor government policies to maintain its independence. The Assembly Law contains minor improvements over the current law, but continues to require prior approval of any assembly by the local governor.  
 
In December 2007, Human Rights Watch published a report, Shutting Out the Critics, detailing the real harm the existing NGO and Assembly Laws have done to the enjoyment of Jordanians’ rights to peaceful assembly and free association.  
 
In January 2008, you withdrew an earlier, equally disturbing draft of the NGO Law, and you also urged reconsideration of the existing Assembly Law. However, the redrafting of both laws is disappointing both from a procedural and substantive point of view.  
 
The Ministry of Social Development held several meetings with representatives of Jordanian and international non-governmental organizations (NGOs) on the NGO law, but the draft does not appear to reflect any relevant input from these meetings. In particular, the provisions of the current draft remain far removed from the provisions in an alternative draft produced by a coalition of NGOs in 2006 following wide-ranging consultation amongst themselves. On the Assembly Law, there was no consultation, leading NGOs to voice their criticisms to members of parliament.  
 
Furthermore, Jordan’s Bureau of Legislation and Opinion has a dedicated website, supported by U.S. aid for publishing draft laws submitted to parliament and forms for eliciting comment. However neither of the two laws have been published on that website. Despite promises to supply Human Rights Watch with future draft laws, the Ministry of Interior and the Ministry of Social Development did not provide us with drafts when we asked earlier this month.  
 
The NGO Law  
 
The NGO Law currently under consideration by the House of Deputies puts unacceptable curbs on the ability to freely associate with others. Article 3 prohibits an NGO from pursuing “any political objectives that are part of the domain of political parties.” Such a vague phrase can only serve to suppress legitimate NGO activity and would allow the government to bar NGOs from pursuing, for example, human rights investigations, environmental campaigns, or assistance to the poor on the pretext that a political party is already concerned with such matters. Articles 4 to 8 make clear that the government intends to maintain full control over which NGOs it allows to be established. Although the draft law now speaks of “registering” NGOs, the government in fact has increased its powers over the way NGOs are to be set up: The NGO registrar is directly appointed by the Cabinet (Article 4), which “may agree … to having a Jordanian legal person among the founding members of the society who is not from an NGO” (Article 8). The founder of an NGO must be “of good conduct and behavior and not [have been] sentenced” for a dishonorable crime (Article 7.d.). This appears to require a certificate of good conduct from the General Intelligence Department as issued for certain job or visa applications, and, in any event, this onerous requirement for a founder of an NGO has not been justified. The law allows the NGO registrar and the ministry to postpone registration proceedings for an unspecified time for any “deficiency” in the application (Articles 10.b. and 11.b.).  
 
NGOs would find it difficult to operate under this law if the government disapproved of their activities. The NGO must inform the minister and the NGO registrar of the date, place, and agenda of its General Assembly meeting two weeks in advance, and abide by all regulations issued by the ministry, none of which have been published and can be changed at any time without parliamentary approval (Article 14.a.). Without such notice, any decision by the NGO’s General Assembly (to which the minister may appoint a representative), is not considered lawful. Even so, the minister must approve any decision of the General Assembly before it can be carried out (Article 14.b.), and the NGO must receive the minister’s approval to open a branch (Article 13.a.).  
 
The extent to which the ministry can mould the NGO’s activities according to its own policies becomes clear in Article 16 which requires the NGO to present an annual plan for the coming year in addition to an annual report, financial accounting (including the names of all Jordanian donors), and all board decisions.  
 
These provisions are not merely unnecessary bureaucratic obstacles, but seem designed solely to give the government absolute control to shut out its critics. The government can influence NGO activities because it will be aware of their annual plans and because it directs a new, governmental NGO fund (Article 22), while imposing conditions on non-governmental funding. The government can also shut down NGOs, by imposing its own temporary board and management, if an NGO fails to rectify within one month a ministerial finding that it is not in compliance with the law or that it has violated its own bylaws (Article 19). The law not only allows government take-overs of NGOs, but Article 20 also allows the minister to shut an NGO down if it fails for the second time to rectify its non-compliance after being admonished, or if the NGO takes a non-Jordanian donation without ministerial approval.  
 
The previous government’s action against the Islamic Center Society in 2006 and 2007 unduly interfered in the Society’s independence by encouraging many new members to join and vote in a new management after it had ousted the old management and replaced it with a temporary board of government officials. (Our report, Shutting Out the Critics, provides details.)  
 
The right to freedom of association with others includes the right not to have to associate with others. A group of persons that disagrees with the practices of any given NGO is always free to form a separate NGO.  
 
Under the NGO law, an NGO’s bylaws, to be submitted at registration, must specify the “conditions for acquiring membership” (Article 6.4.) and the NGO must “open the door of membership to anyone” who qualifies (Article 14.2.) or face dissolution leaving little discretion to the founders to choose their fellow activists.  
 
In the summer of 2006, and again in the summer of 2007, the government also installed its own officials as the temporary management of the General Union of Voluntary Societies (GUVS), and the NGO union’s Amman branch, alleging financial irregularities, in particular donations GUVS made to Palestinian and Lebanese beneficiaries, and proceeds from a raffle. The new NGO law now attempts to subject all NGO income to government approval, although the government has nowhere shown the necessity of doing so.  
 
Under the new NGO law, a Jordanian NGO would need ministerial approval for funding from non-Jordanians (Article 17.1.), and foreign NGOs in Jordan would require ministerial approval for Jordanian funding (Article 9.c.) If an NGO in Jordan took Jordanian funding “without disclosing it and entering it into the registers,” the responsible persons could be fined up to JOD1,000. However, a harsher punishment of at least three months in prison awaits those from NGOs who “kept or used [funding] from non-Jordanian persons without disclosing it or entering it into the registers” (Article 26).  
 
It is unclear whether the government views Jordanian or non-Jordanian donors as more suspect, but it is obvious that these measures target U.S. - and E.U.-financed domestic human rights NGOs, as well as foreign branches of international human rights and humanitarian NGOs and think tanks. Both groups are amongst the most critical of Jordanian government policies.  
 
The Assembly Law  
 
The new Assembly Law makes some improvements over the existing law, but does not restore the freedom of assembly guaranteed before the existing law introduced drastic changes in 2001. Prior to 2001, demonstrations and public gatherings only required notifying the authorities, whereas now, organizers of such events have to obtain advance, written approval from the authorities.  
 
The draft Assembly Law continues to require prior written approval by the governor in order to hold a public meeting. It has reduced the governor’s response time from three to two days, and considers a lack of response to be an approval. The governor is still not obliged to justify the refusal to grant permission for any gathering, although the law exempts from the requirement to seek permission meetings of NGOs, professional associations, and political parties, among other official bodies, “on condition that these meetings and gatherings are linked to the realization of their objectives and in accordance to the legislations regulating their work and activities” (Article 3.1.).  
 
The changes to the Assembly Law are unlikely to change the practice of Jordanian governors who regularly deny permission to hold legitimate public demonstrations and retain the power to deny NGOs permission to hold meetings and workshops if they determine them to be outside of the scope of work of the NGO.  
 
Your Excellency, Jordan should continue to fulfill its promises of reform to better protect the rights of Jordanians to peaceful assembly and free association. The NGO and Assembly laws, as they stand, do not achieve that promise. The NGO law unacceptably restricts the right to free association in violation of Article 22 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) which became law in Jordan on June 15, 2006. Jordanian practice has shown that the new provisions of the Assembly Law will be insufficient to comply with the right to peaceful assembly under Article 21 of the ICCPR.  
 
Jordan could avoid backsliding in the protection of human rights by keeping its promises of engaging civil society in the process of drafting laws. These laws should protect the independence of NGOs from government while increasing their transparency and allow the free expression of opinions through public assembly while ensuring the safety and security of others.  
 
We urge you to immediately withdraw these two draft laws and restart an inclusive process of drafting new laws in full compliance with Jordan’s international human rights obligations.  
 
Sincerely,  
 
/s/  
 
Sarah Leah Whitson  
Middle East and North Africa Director  
Human Rights Watch  
 
Cc:  
H.E. Dr. Basim ‘Awwadallh, Head of the Royal Court of His Majesty King Abdullah II  
H.E. Abd al-Hadi al-Majali, President of the Council of Deputies  
H.E. Zaid al-Rifa’i, President of the Council of Senators  
H.E. Hala Latuf, Minister of Social Development  
H.E. Eid al-Fayez, Minister of Interior  
Group of Members of the U.S. Congress, “Friends of Jordan”  
Group of Members of the European Parliament visiting Jordan in April 2008
 
For further information, please visit the official web site of New York-based Human Rights Watch

 

The International Community Blasts the Dictator King Abdullah II...

 

JNM, Amman, Jordan (Sunday, May 11, 2008): New York-based Human Rights Watch issued the following report re: the recent tragic crime committed by King Abdullah II’s brutal forces against prisoners housed in Al-Muwaqar prison:

 

Jordan: Prison Burning Deaths Need Independent Investigation

Police Investigation Ignores Evidence, Intimidates Witnesses

(New York, May 8, 2008) – King Abdullah should order an independent investigation into the events surrounding the deaths on April 14 of three prisoners at al-Muwaqqar prison east of Amman, Human Rights Watch said today. Despite ample evidence of misconduct, and potentially criminal acts by prison officials, police authorities told Human Rights Watch that their investigation into the incident will vindicate the prison officials, setting out that they acted correctly.  

“The police investigation is an attempt to whitewash the events leading up to the burning to death of three inmates in Jordan,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director at Human Rights Watch. “It has lost all credibility.”  
 
Since the deaths of the three prisoners, the police have placed in solitary confinement many of those detainees in al-Muwaqqar who were eyewitnesses to the events. Security officials have prevented lawyers, family members and human rights investigators from visiting them. Witnesses report that police have intimidated them and have ignored accounts that at least two of the men burned to death had been seriously tortured just prior to the fire, shedding doubt on whether the men had in fact died accidentally. The governmental
National Center
for Human Rights (NCHR) issued a report on April 16, based on its investigation at al-Muwaqqar on April 15, confirming beatings and ill-treatment at the prison before the fire.  
 
It is not disputed that at around
noon
on April 14, approximately 28 prisoners in Cell 3 of Section A of the newly-built al-Muwaqqar prison set their foam mattresses alight as a protest to events at the prison. Prisoners occupying neighboring cells joined in the protest, shouting and inflicting harm on themselves with sharp objects. In response, the prison perimeter guards (Darak) entered the prison building to secure the burning cell. What happened next is contested, but ultimately, when the Civil Defense later extinguished the fire in the cell, they found the burned bodies of Firas al-‘Utti, Hazim Ziyada, and Ibrahim al-‘Ulayan.  
 
The police claim that the prisoners had barricaded the doors of the burning cell with beds to prevent the guards from opening them. However, one eyewitness denies this; he described in detail how prisoners were shouting for the Darak and prison guards to open the door of the burning cell, but that they idly stood by for around 10 minutes before opening the doors. Two other eyewitnesses also said that before opening the door, the Darak fired a gas container into the cell. Guards reportedly shot one prisoner in the chest with one or more rubber bullets. When the Darak opened the doors, the eyewitnesses claim that all 28 prisoners left the cell. The NCHR pointed out that the doors of the cell open to the outside, allowing the guards to open the doors regardless of any barricade inside the cells.  
 
Eyewitness accounts  
 
According to two eyewitnesses, the fire was almost extinguished by the time the doors were open to allow the prisoners to exit the cell. One eyewitness said that the Darak viciously beat those who exited, “splitting open their skulls.” The NCHR recorded blood stains in the rooms, corridors, and the exercise yard.  
 
Then, eyewitnesses said, the Darak pushed 18 people back into Cell 3. These 18 include the three whose bodies were found, as well as Majid Khatir, Abed al-Khaffash, Muhammad al-Tabbash, and Faisal al-‘Udwan, whose whereabouts are now unknown. After the cell door had been relocked with the 18 men inside, a second, much bigger fire started and it was that fire which the Civil Defense extinguished when they arrived about 15-20 minutes later, two eyewitnesses said. The NCHR report notes that a fire hose belonging to the prison was in place 4 meters from the burning cell.  
 
One day before the incident, Human Rights Watch met with the director of the Public Security Directorate (PSD), Brig.-Gen. Mazin al-Qadi, who promised that the PSD (which includes the police and the prison service) would be fully transparent in its dealing with Human Rights Watch. Human Rights Watch also spoke with police officials on April 15, April 20, and May 5. A Human Rights Watch researcher visited the outside of the prison on April 15 and witnessed a large presence of security guards. The officials insisted that there was no wrongdoing by any security forces, including both Darak and prison guards, in connection with the April 14 fire, and that the police investigation would conclude soon.  
 
Families left in the dark  
 
The families of the three dead prisoners and eyewitnesses told Human Rights Watch that all three who died had complained during visits days before the fire about ill-treatment, in particular by a Captain ‘Amir Qutaish, who they claim insulted and beat them. An eyewitness alleges that on April 13 this officer suspended Firas al-‘Utti and Hazim Ziyada, two of the men later burned in the fire, for four to five hours from a wall with their hands shackled behind their back (the shabah torture position) while beating them. This was in response to the fact that some 100 prisoners had started a hunger strike that day protesting ill-treatment. Families and eyewitnesses told Human Rights Watch that Qutaish had bad relations with al-‘Utti and Ziyada dating back to a period that the men had spent in a different prison. Al-‘Utti also reportedly tried to warn a visitor to the prison that Qutaish had allegedly made threats against them just five days before the fire. One eyewitness said that Qutaish threatened al-‘Utti, Ziyada and another two prisoners with ill-treatment again only hours before the fire on April 14. Three eyewitnesses spoke of the frequent morning searches, beatings, and insults by prison guards and the shabah-style torture of prisoners who resisted the searches.  
 
After the fire, the prison administration placed all surviving prisoners from Cell 3, Section A and the roughly 100 other prisoners who had witnessed the events either into solitary confinement or separate from the remaining prison population after they had briefly been treated for smoke inhalation, burns, or injuries from beatings. At dawn on April 15, they transferred between 15 and 60 prisoners to other prisons. Their families and lawyers have been unable to visit the isolated prisoners, “by order of the Ministry of Interior,” one family member told Human Rights Watch. Human Rights Watch knows of at least five families unable to visit their loved ones in prison since the incident. The prison also prohibited the visiting NCHR representatives from seeing these prisoners.  
 
Eyewitnesses also said that the police put pressure on the transferred prisoners to exonerate the security forces of the deaths and warned them not to mention that complaints about torture had given rise to the protest.  
 
On April 20, four days after issuing its critical findings on al-Muwaqqar, the executive director of the NCHR, Shaher Bak, resigned.  
 
“King Abdullah has an obligation under human rights law to set up an independent commission with judicial powers to investigate the torture, protests and response to the fire in al-Muwaqqar prison, as the police authorities have clearly shown themselves incapable of holding their own members to account,” said Whitson.  
 
Human Rights Watch is concerned that, even with evidence of criminal culpability on the part of the members of the Public Security Directorate, there are significant obstacles in the way of prosecution. In
Jordan
, a police court has jurisdiction over all cases in which members of the PSD stand accused of crimes. The PSD director appoints police officers as judges of the police court as well as the police prosecutors, and he retains the right to reduce sentences. Such a tribunal fails to meet any standard of independent judicial scrutiny.  
 
The police court has a poor record of holding police to account for abuses. In March 2008, the police court sentenced two officers who beat an inmate to death in Aqaba prison to two-and-a-half years in prison, but only after private efforts by the family of the deceased, the
US embassy, and Human Rights Watch to bring the perpetrators to justice. Before these efforts, the police court merely charged the men with “abuse of authority” and “violating orders and directives.” In December 2007, the police court sentenced the director of Swaqa prison to two months in prison for “exercising unlawful authority resulting in harm,” then commuted the sentence to a fine of JOD120, or about US$170. The prison director had beaten, and forcibly shaved the heads and beards, of almost all 2,100 inmates at Swaqa prison, Jordan’s largest, on his first day as director there.

Human Rights Watch Slams King Abdullah II’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs Report

HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH

Jordan: Clarifications on World Report Chapter 2008

Human Rights Watch Response to Ministry of Foreign

Affairs Critique

New York, February 19, 2008  
 
H.E. Salah al-Bashir  
Minister of Foreign Affairs  
Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan  
 
Your Excellency,  
 
We read with interest your detailed reply to our World Report 2008 chapter detailing major human rights related developments in 2007. Your reply, and in particular the detail you provide, are amongst the most productive governmental correspondence Human Rights Watch has received in response to our reporting. We trust this marks the seriousness with which Jordan is treating the protection of human rights, and hope this approach will allow for genuine discussion of contentious areas.

We hope that we can soon report positive results stemming from Jordan’s initiatives for the greater protection of human rights in the areas you mention, including a revision of the laws of Public Assembly and that of Charitable Societies, and improved accountability in respect of abuses by officials against detainees. We intend this public letter to reflect our acknowledgment of Jordan’s initial efforts in these areas.  
 
We wish to make several points in response to your comments. As a preliminary matter, we should point out that our cutoff point for factual updates of our World Report is early November, due to production timelines. We were thus unable to include the important amendment of the penal code’s article 208 that now establishes torture and ill-treatment of detainees as a crime in Jordan and provided information available at that time regarding permission by independent monitors to enter polling centers.  
 
We followed the government’s own figures on protective custody, referenced in their combined third and fourth periodic report to the UN CEDAW on March 10, 2006. In this report, the government states that the “cumulative yearly total numbers of women placed in protective custody between 1997 and 2004 ranged between 400 and 800.” During a visit to Juwaida in late October 2007—too late for inclusion in the World Report—we found 73 women in administrative detention, of which the government only classified 5 as being in protective custody. However, some of the remaining administrative detainees were detained in circumstances similar to those of women being held for their own protection.  
 
Regarding arbitrary arrests, due process and torture:  
 
As an initial matter, we remain concerned about the continued arbitrary detention of Isam al-‘Utaibi (Abu Muhammad al-Maqdisi) at the General Intelligence Department (GID). In a decision made public on January 8, 2008, the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention found that “the deprivation of liberty of Mr. Issam Mohamed Tahar Barqaoui Al Uteibi is arbitrary” yet he remains imprisoned in solitary confinement without trial for a period that now exceeds three years. On Friday, February 15, 2008, the GID prevented his relatives from visiting al-‘Utaibi who has been on a hungerstrike since February 4 in protest at his indefinite detention. Al-‘Utaibi’s continued detention comes despite reported promises to release him and runs counter to Jordan’s progress in January 2008 in addressing the problem of two other long-term detainees held without trial.  
 
Your assertion that no one is arrested in Jordan without an arrest warrant is not one we can accept, based on interviews with more than one hundred current and former detainees who assert that the arresting authorities never presented such a warrant. It is possible, of course, that such warrants existed, but were not shown. In that case, the guarantee that the warrant presents against arbitrary arrest would be void, since the warrant could have been written after the arrest had taken place. Furthermore, in Jordan, prosecutors, not independent judicial officers, as international human rights standards require, adjudicate on the legality of a person’s detention and remand detainees in custody, removing another layer of protection. During our interviews with Jordanian prosecutors, they were unable to describe what evidentiary standard, if any, they applied to issuing an arrest warrant. Thus an arrest warrant might be issued on very weak evidence.  
 
In addition, in none of the cases of administrative detainees that we have investigated, was the detainee arrested pursuant to arrest warrants.  
 
The problem of arrests on the basis of very weak evidence and spurious charges is particularly acute at the GID. You assert that detainees there are lawfully detained. However, international law requires a detainee to be informed of the reason for his or her detention, to be informed promptly of any charges against him or her, and to be granted communication with the outside world. Despite this, one person we met with in August 2007 during Human Rights Watch’s visit to the GID detention facility did not know where he was. Another detainee did not know what the charges against him were. When Human Rights Watch informed him, he reacted with profound shock. The arrest of a third person was not apparently related to a national security case at all, but resulted from a complaint by a mother suspicious of her daughter’s dating activities.  
 
Effective access to lawyers for GID detainees could help alleviate the problem of arbitrary arrests. We refer you to our letter of December 4, 2007 to Prime Minister Nader Dahabi, regarding the arbitrary detention of Isam al-‘Utaibi, for examples of the obstacles the GID and the military prosecutors impose on detainees to appoint and meet their lawyers. The denial of legal representation in al-‘Utaibi’s case was not an isolated experience for those detained at the GID. Another detainee there demanded to see his lawyer, but was denied access. The six members of Islamic Action Front detained at the time of Human Rights Watch’s visit had also not been able to see their lawyers for a lengthy period of time.  
 
We commend the GID on its increased openness to visits by human rights groups. Such visits seem especially appropriate since the 35 judicial inspections you mention have not been effective in ensuring the laws are fully being implemented. One such inspector Human Rights Watch spoke with admitted that he does not spend time alone with the detainees to hear complaints during tours of inspection, but instead primarily asked the director of the detention facility about any complaints by detainees. Such “inspections” cannot detect abuse.  
 
We did find ill-treatment of detainees during our visit to the GID in August 2007, including illegal threats of lifelong detention made by GID interrogators to detainees, threats of summary deportation, degrading detainees by forcing them to imitate animal behavior, and threats of violence and harm to family members. A systemic problem is the routine solitary confinement of detainees at the GID. If detention at the GID is subject to the Law on Correctional and Rehabilitation Centers, as you and GID officials assert, solitary confinement would be limited to seven days, not the months and years that some detainees currently face.  
 
We are eager to learn about the accomplishments of the new unit in the Public Security Directorate (PSD) established to hear complaints of inmates and pursue prosecutions against accused officers. We have not yet received the statistics and details about the prosecution of PSD officials that the Ministry of Interior’s Secretary-General promised us in October 2007. Our follow-up with the PSD in 2007 regarding judicial procedures in individual cases of torture that we had documented, but not yet publicized, did not inspire confidence that the Judicial Affairs department in the PSD was vigorously pursuing accountability. The PSD appeared to be dragging its investigation into two cases of torture and did not respond to one other case of alleged torture Human Rights Watch sent to the Jordanian authorities.  
 
Regarding Freedom of Expression, Assembly and Association:  
 
We are interested to hear what progress the government has made in reviewing the penal code and revising articles in it that criminalize free speech. Contrary to your assertion, abolishing imprisonment for journalists in the press and publications law does not “once and for all” rule out the possibility of arrest for legitimate speech. Our World Report contained examples of imprisonment for legitimate speech.  
 
You assert that meetings by political parties, NGOs, professional associations, and chambers of commerce, among others, do not require advance permission from the governor under the current repressive law. We would have included such information had the governor of Amman responded with such information to our letter of June 21, 2007 urging him to exempt NGOs from seeking advance permission for public meetings. However, it appears that only meetings within the premises of such groups may be exempted by a special regulation. These groups’ public meetings, for example in rented hotel facilities, still require advance permission from the governor.  
 
We also refer you to Human Rights Watch’s December 2007 report, “Shutting Out the Critics.” Cases documented there demonstrate that the governor’s refusal to grant NGOs or other groups permission to hold public meetings was not based on concerns for the security and safety of persons and property, as you claim. You are informing us for the first time that a governor’s refusal can be judicially challenged. To assess the effectiveness of such challenges, please provide us with the legal basis that allows such a challenge, and all court cases of such challenges since June 2001, their outcomes, the reasoning of the court in upholding or rejecting the refusal, and the arguments the governors put forward in justifying their decision to deny permission.  
 
For reasons of timing explained above, we were unable to commend the government regarding Prime Minister Nader Dahabi’s promise of January 8 to amend the Law of Public Gatherings, and to withdraw from parliamentary consideration the draft Law on Charitable Societies. We look forward to seeing new draft laws that would protect the right to assembly and association. We hope that a revised law will protect the independence of non-governmental organizations and prevent repeats of the government takeover in 2006 of two large NGOs, the General Union of Voluntary Societies and the Islamic Center Society. These takeovers went far beyond any action warranted by a judicial inquiry into individual administrative and financial wrongdoing.  
 
Regarding Iraqi refugees:  
 
Lastly, Human Rights Watch wishes to assure the government of its recognition that Jordan has shouldered over many years a disproportionate burden by hosting large numbers of Iraqi refugees. We continue to urge the United States, Britain and other European Union member states, and Jordan’s southern neighbors to take more Iraqi refugees and to support Jordan financially.  
 
But we criticize policies such as denying Iraqis in Jordan refugee status, effectively closing its borders to asylum seekers, and, at various times over the past two years, providing only halting cooperation to efforts by the international community to assist Iraqi refugees in Jordan. The effect of Jordan’s policies, coupled with those of Western countries preferring to provide financial aid to accepting adequate numbers of refugees themselves, is to turn Iraqis fleeing for their lives into bargaining chips between Jordan and the U.S. and U.K. We call for Jordan to adhere to international refugee law by admitting and protecting refugees with genuine asylum claims, regardless of their visa status.  
 
We thank you for your attention to these matters, and look forward to your response.  
 
Sincerely,  
 
/s  
 
Kenneth Roth  
Executive Director  
Human Rights Watch  
 
Cc: H.E. Nasser Judeh, Deputizing Minister of Foreign Affairs  
 
Ibrahim Awawda, Director, Human Rights and Human Security Department  

New York-Based Human Rights Watch Blasts King Abdullah II's Bribed Journalists & Columnists

JNM, Amman-Jordan (Wednesday, January 30, 2008): The recent moves by King Abdullah II and his intelligence community—which include lawsuits and contempt cases against reporters, columnists and human rights activists—are among the harshest anti—press actions since the country ruled by the late dictator King Hussein, from 1953 to 1999. The steps taken and ordered personally by King Abdullah II underscore distrust and hostility between the unaccountable king and the Jordanian intellectuals.

New York-based Human Rights Watch issued the following press release in response to awful articles written by pro-absolute monarchy columnists and printed in state-run newspapers against Human Rights Watch and its successful and unrelenting campaign against rampant human rights abuses in the Kingdom of corruption. In this press release, Human Rights Watch highlighted the name of and briefly outlined ill-founded accusations made by Tariq Masarwa, a former Senator appointed by King Abdullah II and a paid agent (columnist) of the General Intelligence Department (GID), who in one of his recent absurd articles asked the unelected government and its omni-security apparatus to jail anyone who reads and supports reports issued by Human Rights Watch! In fact, Tariq Masarwa (known in Jordan as Abu Ali) has received large sums of money and hush bribes from the thuggish dictator Saddam Hussein to defend and sell his antagonistic policies in Jordan and the Arab press.

Here is the press release issued by Human Rights Watch:

HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH

Deflecting Attention from Jordan’s Repressive Laws

NEW YORK – Tariq Masarwa (“Watching Human Rights in the Prisons for Iraqi Women … and in Jordan!”, December 25) makes several unsubstantiated accusations against Human Rights Watch in an attempt to discredit our latest report on the Jordanian government’s use of repressive laws to restrict civil society’s fundamental rights to expression, association and assembly “Shutting Out the Critics,” published December 17 in Amman). Instead of addressing the issues raised by the report, he tries to distract the reader with mischaracterizations about our reporting on other countries and about methods of operation.

Human Rights Watch’s report, “Shutting Out the Critics” documents in detail governmental repression under the current 1966 nongovernmental organization (NGO) law and the dangers posed by the proposed NGO law to improperly interfere in the work of NGOs. The report criticizes the Jordanian government for severely restricting the rights of its citizens to peacefully assemble and protest governmental policies. We also call on the United States and the European Union, generous supporters of the Jordanian government, to condition future aid to Jordan on the reform of these oppressive laws.  
 
Masarwa makes a great deal about abuses in Iraqi prisons, accusing Human Rights Watch of ignoring human rights violations there, as if the existence of abuses in Iraq should justify overlooking abuses in Jordan. A quick check of our website shows that we have reported extensively on Iraqi prison conditions since 1991, most recently in a July 2007
report on security detainees in Iraqi Kurdistan. Since the US-led invasion of Iraq, we have reported on numerous US abuses in Iraq and continue to press for accountability and prosecution of former US secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld, and former director of the Central Intelligence Agency George Tenet for their role in the mistreatment of detainees at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere.  
 
Masarwa also tries to avoid discussing the Jordanian government’s human rights abuses by charging – without presenting any evidence – that we are agents of Western powers and a “mercenary of US intelligence.” Human Rights Watch is a non-profit, independent, non-governmental organization (with no affiliation to the UN or any other governmental or inter-governmental body) that in our nearly 30 years of existence has never accepted funding from any government, arms or oil company. Our sources of funding are made public in our annual report, available on our website at www.hrw.org. Exceptionally, we do not identify witnesses or victims of human rights abuses in our reports where there is a reasonable fear of governmental retribution against those individuals or organizations, such as occasionally happens in Jordan. 

Human Rights Watch stands by its reporting on Jordan and our methods of operation. But it serves no one – certainly not the people of Jordan – to continue to ignore serious rights violations by the Jordanian government. It is time for those issues to get proper attention in the media.
 
Web link and Arabic Translation:  http://hrw.org/english/docs/2008/01/14/jordan17734.htm
 
Also, Human Rights Watch issued its 2007 report on human rights abuses in Jordan: http://hrw.org/englishwr2k8/docs/2008/01/31/jordan17607.htm

Former MP Attacks King Abdullah II

Part I of the Speech   Part II of the Speech

JNM, Amman-Jordan (Thursday, January 31, 2008): Former Member of Parliament the Honorable Toujan Al-Faisal delivered one of her strongest speeches at the Arabic Circle at the University of Chicago's Center for Middle Eastern Studies.

The Honorable Al-Faisal made it very clear that King Abdullah II was behind the government’s decision to ban her from running for previous Parliament elections. To prevent and convince the Honorable Al-Faisal not to run for these elections, King Abdullah II offered her three new Mercedes cars, one for her and the other two for her two daughters, a luxury single family home in a posh area in Western Amman, and a blank check for unlimited cash money. The offer was delivered by Saad Kheir, former Director of the corrupt General Intelligence Department (GID).

Also, the Honorable Al-Faisal told the large crowd that a member of the royal family informed her that King Abdullah II ordered his security apparatus to prevent her from running. The king said, “do whatever it takes…do not underestimate her this time…”

This is King Abdullah II: An uncivilized bandit in the heart of the Middle East who, of course, has very little respect for mankind and the fine principles of genuine democracy and freedom of speech…this man deserves no respect and the international community must condemn him in the strongest terms for his utter lack of respect towards human rights and the rule of law…

Endless Human Rights Abuses Committed by King Abdullah II

JNM, Amman-Jordan (Sunday, January 27, 2008): Amnesty International in 2007, the U.S. State Department in its annual human rights reports to Congress, the U.N. Human Rights Commission and New York-based Human Rights Watch have all sharply criticized and censured King Abdullah II’s human rights record regularly…and these grisly human rights abuses are rising up:

On Thursday, January 24, 2007, Jameel Al-Nimri, a columnist in Al-Ghad daily newspaper and TV show host, was attacked by masked men at his home in Tlaa Al-Ali District of Western Amman. He was released from the hospital after sustaining serious injuries in his face (see picture above)…the attackers used sharp knife in their cowardly attack and fled the seen immediately. In his recent articles, Al-Nimri blasted the unelected government of King Abdullah II for its total fiasco in managing the national economy, and 2007 parliament and municipality elections.  

Hit and run is now a new method used by King Abdullah II’s intelligence community to terrorize journalists and human rights activists in Jordan: Just a few weeks ago, King Abdullah II’s security forces abducted, beat up and shaved the beard of former MP Dr. Al-Ali Alatoum (see picture above), and burned the personal vehicle of Osama Al-Ramini (see picture above), Editor-in-Chief of the Weekly News publication. Despite promises from the king’s security apparatus to investigate these serious incidents, nothing happened.

These continuing outrages by this regime prove that King Abdullah II and his intelligence community are shameless…King Abdullah II’s growing mastery in deploying the vocabulary and diplomacy of human rights abroad while making a practice of serious and systematic human rights violations at home must not pass without ongoing condemnation by the civil and free world. His ultimate goal is to terrorize and sow the seeds of fear in the hearts and minds of the Jordanian people. This absurd strategy may work in the short-term, but in the long run it will back fire and eventually diminish the remaining legacy of the Hashemite family in Jordan and the Middle East region.

King Abdullah II Strips Citizenship From Jordanian Human Rights Activists

JNM, Amman-Jordan (Sunday, December 30, 2007): King Abdullah II of Jordan endorsed and ratified, by royal decree, draconian and unjust decisions by his appointed government to strip Jordanian citizenship from several political and human rights activists: So far, six cases have been reported this year and 12 occurred in 2006. All of these particular cases have been reported by the Jordan Engineers Association (JEA). In a letter addressed to the unelected Prime Minister of Jordan Nader Dahabi, whose brother is the current Director of the General Intelligence Department (GID), on Sunday, December 30, 2007, the Head of JEA, Engineer Wael Al-Saqa, demanded that “citizenship must be restored to Engineers Raed Ismail Baryoush and Ahmad Khalid Al-Ashqar.”

According to Al-Saqa, “Baryoush was born in Aqaba, Jordan, in 1962, bears Jordanian Citizenship Certificate, National Number and previously served in the Jordanian army. His father is the former Head of JEA. Al-Ashqar was born in Amman, Jordan, in 1972, and his citizenship was withdrawn from him on Sunday, September 23, 2007.”

All of these inhuman actions by King Abdullah II’s corrupt and dictatorial regime aim to spread fear amongst the large Palestinian-Jordanian community in Jordan to prevent it from participating in political activities and practicing their rights as full Jordanian citizens.

The families of these Engineers and the great majority of the Jordanian people beseech you: The U.S. Congress, World Human Rights organizations, and other political and humanitarian associations to press the dictator King Abdullah II of Jordan, during his upcoming visits to the U.S. and other countries, to withdraw this decision and release all political prisoners in Jordan.

Do not let the corrupt king or his officials seduce you or sidetrack you. You must call for, and sharply censure, the king’s current policy of detaining, abusing, and torturing his Jordanian political foes because of their basic political ideology. King Abdullah II’s current political stratagem may be zealously pursued but those acts are causing skepticism, cacophony, and repudiation within Jordan and throughout the civilized world.

Harassment of Journalists and Abusing the Judicial System Continue Under the Thuggish and Dictatorial Regime of King Abdullah II

Fahad Al-Rimawi                King Abdullah II

 

JNM, Amman, Jordan (Sunday, 12/2/2007):  In a workshop held in Amman, in October 2007, the Chairman of the Judicial Council, one of the highest judicial authorities in the country, Judge Mohammad Raqad, made it very clear that the judicial system in Jordan is dependent on, and a tool in the hands of the royal family and their unelected governments.

Judge Raqad made the following astonishing statements:

1.     “Courts and judges are totally dependent on financial support from the [appointed] governments…if I need to buy refreshments, office supplies, hire or replace a staff member, I must get the approval of the appointed Minister of Justice…”

2.     “Instead of appearing before a court of law, public prosecutors are being summoned and coerced by [appointed] Ministers at their official offices to take their statements in lawsuits filed by these Ministers against journalists and other respected citizens who have accused these [blatant] officials of being abusive and corrupt…”

3.     “Establishing the State Security [Military] Court or other special courts to prosecute citizens, civil ones or military personnel, is absolutely an unjustified course of action…”

4.     “I have told [corrupt] judges that Ministers or high-level decision makers will not help them on the Day of Judgment…”

Judge Raqad’s statements are consistent with and reflect the deteriorating state of affairs and crisis of trust between the Hashemite leadership and the Jordanian citizenry. For instance, Saber Al-Rawashdah, Amman’s former Public Prosecutor and an agent for the General Intelligence Department (GID), collaborated with the royal court and GID to arrest and jail Dr. Al-Abbadi on Wednesday, May 2, 2007. His award: Appointed, just a few days ago, to a high level position in the government, General Inspector of Businesses at the Ministry of Industry and Trade.

Today, King Abdullah II told the new parliament whose 40-50 percent of its members won their seats via illegitimate means, such as vote-buying and transferring votes from one electoral district to another, “…the constitution has guaranteed freedom of expression, and therefore it is unacceptable that a journalist gets jailed due to a difference in opinion re: a public cause as long as this difference in opinion does not infringe on people’s rights, freedom or honors…” So now we have an absolute king who tells us what is right and what is wrong, how to behave and how we should interpret the terms of this constitution…it is an absurd monarchy that we are dealing with in Jordan…On the other hand, the State TV did not carry live the king's speech due to his embarrasing and broken Arabic language.

While he was delivering his stumpy speech, Fahad Al-Rimawi, Editor-in-Chief of Al-Majd weekly newspaper, appeared before a judge at Amman Court of Conciliation (ACC) for a lawsuit filed by the government’s Department of Publications against Al-Rimawi. The lawsuit focuses on an article published by the newspaper that criticized the former appointed government of Marrouf Al-Bakhit of being comic and carbon copies of previous corrupt and hand-picked governments.

This is another example of the double-face policy that King Abdullah II is trying very hard to execute before the watching eyes of the local audience and international community: Saying something good at the podium and on the international stage while ordering and pushing his security forces, behind closed doors, to terrorize local journalists, human rights and political activists.

King Abdullah II’s flat lies and revolving door policies have produced very little positive results on the tracks of economic and political reforms. According to recent official data, published by the Ministry of Finance, the internal and foreign debt rose at the rate of 15.1%, reaching a record high of $10.34 billion, since he assumed power in February 1999. Scientific polls released on Monday, April 18, 2005 by the Centre for Strategic Studies (CSS) at the University of Jordan, indicates that 79.5 per cent of citizens say they have not felt any positive impact upon their living standards over the past three years despite the fact that official statistics indicate an economic growth of 4-7 per cent of the gross domestic product. On December 1, 2007, Jameel Al-Nimri, a columnist in Al Arab Al Yawm daily newspaper, said “after [recent] parliament elections, defenders of political reforms need to sit and rest in the bleachers, intertwine their hands and cross their legs, watching the outcome of the process of jettisoning political reforms…”

King Abdullah is ruling with the iron fist and has become careless of what the international community thinks of his poor leadership and increasing lack of popularity amongest the Jordanian citizens. The king promotes and keeps corrupt fat cats and shuns intellectuals and opposition figures from taking part in the decision-making process. Daily and weekly publications have reported continuously that he firmly believes in the popular expression, “My way or the highway.” For instance, most of the appointed members of government and senate are spouses, siblings, close relatives and cronies of other high-level decision makers in the government and royal court. In fact, the new Chief of the Royal Court, Bassem Awadallah, is the son of a convicted felon in a U.S. Federal court.

People of Jordan are now changing directions of loyalty and news from Amman gives the signal that the Jordanian Army is very unhappy with the monarch’s negative behavior. Further, the international community must take bold, practical and courageous measures against the corrupt absolute monarchical regime of King Abdullah II. We need to work together to curb this regime’s double-faced local and foreign policies that deceive the global civilized community regarding daily dictatorial activities against the people of Jordan. 

Jordan: End Unneeded Restraints on Civil Society

JNM, Amman-Jordan (Sunday, December 16, 2007): New York-based Human Rights Watch issued the following blasting report from the heart of Amman, the capital of King Abdullah II’s thuggish and dictatorial regime. JNM will forward this report to and lobby key U.S. Congressional and European Union leaders and staff re: the content of this very credible and powerful document: 
 

 

Jordan: End Unneeded Restraints on Civil Society

 

US and EU Should Condition Funding on Respect, Independence for Civil Society

 

Text of Press Release:

(Amman, December 17, 2007) – Jordan should change its laws that severely restrict public assembly and the freedom and independence of nongovernmental organizations, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today.  

In the 42-page report, “Shutting Out the Critics,” Human Rights Watch also called on the United States and the European Union to condition some funding to Jordan on changes in these laws.  
 
“While promising to foster civil society, Jordanian authorities have instead made life more difficult for nongovernmental groups,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director at Human Rights Watch. “The government is using oppressive laws and practices to shut out private citizens from peacefully participating in public policy debates.”  
 
For six years, Jordan’s administrative governors have used restrictive laws to sharply reduce the freedom of individuals and organizations to meet, organize and demonstrate in public. Since 2001 the government has enforced a Law on Public Gatherings that defines a public gathering very broadly, encompassing any meeting between two persons even in a private home or office. It obliges organizers to seek advance permission from governors, who arbitrarily can prohibit gatherings without the possibility of appeal.  
 
“Shutting Out the Critics” documents how governors have increasingly used this law to deny most requests for demonstrations deemed critical of the government, such as requests made in June 2007 to hold demonstrations against Israeli practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The government also denied earlier requests to demonstrate against US practices in Iraq and to protest against the Jordanian government’s raising of domestic fuel prices. It highlights how the authorities have more recently gone further, even prohibiting nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) from meeting in rented facilities, for example to discuss an election monitoring coalition.  
 
This year, the government has also cracked down on NGOs with two legislative initiatives that significantly impinge upon their ability to operate independently. In April, a new regulation imposed unnecessary and excessive restrictions on NGO funding from foreign and domestic sources. An NGO law proposed in October would bar any domestic or foreign donations to NGOs without prior government approval. The proposed law leaves almost unchanged the Ministry of Social Development’s unwarranted powers of control and interference over NGO affairs, including the power to license and dissolve them or take over their management.  
 
The report documents several examples of government attempts to control independent NGOs. In 2006, the government took over the management of the Islamic Center Society and of the General Union of Voluntary Societies, two large and longstanding Jordanian NGOs, rather than simply prosecuting the individuals suspected of financial wrongdoing. In 2007, the government exerted pressure on an NGO to amend its proposed bylaws to reduce the scope of its proposed human rights work. Such governmental actions have made it much more difficult for NGOs to work independently and voice criticism of the government.  
 
The US and EU together provided more than US$600 million in assistance to Jordan in 2006. Both donors have stated that their goal is to assist Jordan in developing its democratic institutions and strengthening civil society. Yet neither has developed the appropriate funding mechanisms, such as funding conditions, to ensure that Jordan’s laws and practices comply with international standards on the rights to freedom of assembly and of association. They have stood by and continued to fund the government while its laws and practices have increasingly interfered with NGO work. This undermines their financial support for local NGOs, which have less and less ability to work independently.  
 
“It’s a futile exercise of misplaced philanthropy for the US and EU to be rewarding Jordan for continuing to restrict the activities of civil society groups,” Whitson said. “The US and EU should withhold funds to the government until the unnecessary restrictions are lifted.”  
 
The restrictions on assembly and association in Jordan’s laws violate both the spirit of the Jordanian constitution and the letter of international law. Article 16 of Jordan’s constitution provides for the right to peaceful assembly and association. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which became law in Jordan in 2006, allows only for narrow and limited restrictions on these rights as are “necessary for national security or public safety, public order, the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.” Jordan’s broad limitations on the right to assembly and association do not meet these narrow criteria for permitted exceptions.

Full Report:

Shutting Out the Critics: Restrictive Laws Used to Repress Civil Society in Jordan
Report, December 17, 2007

The Corrupt Kingdom of Abu Hussein (King Abdullah II)...

Former MP Tawjan Faisal prevented from running for elections by King Abdullah II

JNM, Amman-Jordan (Tuesday, November 13, 2007): The thuggish and erratic dictator King Abdullah II and his thieves and military dictatorship in Amman have lost their honor. Indeed, they have lost their face and must be speechless as these very embarrassing pictures (see above) flash and news stories unfold before the watching eyes of the civilized world.  

King Abdullah II is calling for impartial Parliamentarian elections? What a joke? Who is he deceiving here? Are the United States Government and Congress watching what this man is doing back home? This is King Abdullah II’s version of democracy: bribery, forgery and flat lies. The United States must do something to stop this massacre of democracy…We must stop this liar and thief from spending millions of dollars in foreign aid to hold his grip on power in Amman….The United States must stop supporting such a rogue regime…The Jordanian people do not deserve this…we do not deserve this brutal regime…   

Leading critics of King Abdullah II’s repressive regime, such as Dr. Al-Abbadi, Tawjan Faisal and Laith Shubeilat, have all spent time in jail simply because they have called for greater freedom and constitutional monarchy…In fact, the scholar Dr. Al-Abbadi is still in jail after he simply called for freedom of speech and full eradication of corruption in the Hashemite Royal Court and the unelected government, as well as immediate stop to human rights abuses in the country.

Now, the tribal-based Parliament elections will be held on Tuesday, November 20, 2007….People in the street are selling their votes…Tribal fights have erupted all over the corrupt Kingdom of King Abdullah II…The headquarters of tribal candidates have been burned by supporters of other opposing candidates from the same clan (see above picture). And massive vote-buying is taking place now on the streets all over the country under the watching eyes of King Abdullah II’s General Intelligence Department (GID) and its omnipresent undercover agents….

Each vote is sold for $150…Despite the videos and pictures taken by journalists and reporters of this vote-buying, no one has ever been officially punished for this shameful and disgusting practice! This is simply the corrupt Kingdom of Al-Maniak Abu Hussein (King Abdullah II)….

News story in Arabic re: Vote-Buying, Published on November 14, by Arab Al Yawm Newspaper:

14/11/2007)

ÇáÚÑÈ Çáíæã

ÑÛã ÇÚáÇä ÇáÍßæãÉ ÇáãÊßÑÑ ÈÇÊÎÇÐ ÇÔÏ ÇáÚÞæÈÇÊ ÈÍÞ ÇáãÊæÑØíä Ýí ÚãáíÇÊ ÔÑÇÁ ÇÕæÇÊ ÇáäÇÎÈíä ÇáãäÕæÕ ÚáíåÇ Ýí ÞÇäæä ÇáÇäÊÎÇÈ ÇáãÄÞÊ, ÇáÇ Çä ÇáãÑÇÞÈíä ááÍãáÉ ÇáÇäÊÎÇÈíÉ íÓÌáæä ÔæÇåÏ Úáì ÇáÙÇåÑÉ ãÇ ÒÇáÊ ÊÑÊßÈ Úáì äØÇÞ æÇÓÚ Ýí ÏæÇÆÑ ÇäÊÎÇÈíÉ ÚÏÉ æÊåÏÏ äÒÇåÉ ÇáÇäÊÎÇÈÇÊ ÇáÊí ÊÍÑÕ ÇáÏæáÉ Úáì ÇÌÑÇÆåÇ Èßá ÔÝÇÝíÉ.

æÍÕáÊ "ÇáÚÑÈ Çáíæã" Úáì ÔÑíØ "ÝíÏíæ" Êã ÊÕæíÑå Ýí ãÞÑ ÃÍÏ ãÑÔÍí ÏæÇÆÑ ÚãÇä æíÙåÑ Ýíå ÚÏÏ ãä ÇáäÇÔØíä Ýí ÍãáÉ ÇáãÑÔÍ æåã íÓáãæä ãÈÇáÛ ãÇáíÉ áÚÏÏ ãä ÇáÇÔÎÇÕ, æíÓÈÞ Ðáß ßãÇ ÙåÑ Ýí ÇáÔÑíØ ÍáÝ Çáíãíä ãä ÞÈá ÇáäÇÎÈíä Úáì ÇáÞÑÂä ÇáßÑíã æÇáì ÌÇäÈåã íÞÝ ÔÎÕ ËÇáË íÚÇíä ÈØÇÞÇÊ ÇáÇÍæÇá ÇáãÏäíÉ ááÊÃßÏ ãä æÌæÏ ÇÓã ÇáÏÇÆÑÉ ÇáÇäÊÎÇÈíÉ.

æíÙåÑ ÇáÔÑíØ ÇáÐí ÊÒíÏ ãÏÊå Úä ÚÔÑ ÏÞÇÆÞ ÚÏÏÇ áÇ íÞá Úä 7 ÇÔÎÇÕ íÞæãæä ÈäÝÓ ÇáÎØæÇÊ ÇáÓÇÈÞÉ æíÊÓáãæä ãÈÇáÛ ãÇáíÉ.

ßãÇ ÍÕáÊ "ÇáÚÑÈ Çáíæã" Úáì ÕæÑ ÝæÊæÛÑÇÝíÉ áÚãáíÉ ÈíÚ ÇÕæÇÊ ããÇËáÉ.

æßÇäÊ ÇáÌåÇÊ ÇáãÎÊÕÉ Ýí ãÍÇÝÙÉ ÇáÚÇÕãÉ ÇÚáäÊ ÞÈá ÇÓÈæÚíä Úä ÊæÞíÝ ÔÎÕíä íÞæãÇä ÈÌãÚ ÇáÈØÇÞÇÊ ÇáÇäÊÎÇÈíÉ ãÞÇÈá ãÈÇáÛ ãÇáíÉ ãä ÇÍÏì ãäÇØÞ ÚãÇä áÕÇáÍ ãÑÔÍ ÎÇÑÌ ÇáÚÇÕãÉ ßãÇ ÐßÑÊ ÇáãÕÇÏÑ ÇáÑÓãíÉ æÊã ÇÍÇáÊåãÇ Çáì ÇáãÏÚí ÇáÚÇã.

æÝí ÇÍÏ ÇáãÎíãÇÊ ÇáÞÑíÈÉ ãä ÇáÚÇÕãÉ ÇÚÊÑÝ ÇÍÏ ÇáãæÇØäíä -ÑÝÖ ÐßÑ ÇÓãå- áÜ "ÇáÚÑÈ Çáíæã" Çäå ÈÇÚ ÕæÊå åæ æÇÝÑÇÏ ÇÓÑÊå ÇáÚÔÑÉ áÞÇÁ ãÈáÛ 500 ÏíäÇÑ áÇÍÏ ÇáãÑÔÍíä Ýí ÏÇÆÑÉ ÚãÇä ÇáËÇáËÉ æÇÖÇÝ Çäå æÞÚ Úáì ÓäÏ ÞÈÖ ÈÇáãÈáÛ ÇáãÐßæÑ.

æÊÓáãÊ »ÇáÚÑÈ Çáíæã« ãä ÇÍÏ ÇáãæÇØäíä Ýí ãÎíã ÇáÈÞÚÉ ÕæÑÇ áãÆÇÊ ÇáÈØÇÞÇÊ ÇáÔÎÕíÉ Êã äÞáåÇ áÕÇáÍ ÇÍÏ ÇáãÑÔÍíä Ýí ÇáÏÇÆÑÉ ÇáËÇáËÉ Ýí ÇáÇíÇã ÇáÇæáì ãä ÔåÑ ÍÒíÑÇä ÇáãÇÖí ÏÝÚÉ æÇÍÏÉ æíÙåÑ Úáì ÇáÈØÇÞÇÊ ÇÓã ÇáÈÞÚÉ Ýí ÎÇäÉ "ãßÇä ÇáÓßä" ÈíäãÇ Êã ÊËÈíÊ ÇÓã "ÇáËÇáËÉ" Ýí ÎÇäÉ "ÇáÏÇÆÑÉ ÇáÇäÊÎÇÈíÉ".

King Abdullah II’s Upcoming Parliamentary Elections: The New Showcase of Fraud, Heavyhandedness, Irregularities and Violence

King Abdullah II: Darling of the West...a thuggish dictator in Jordan

 

State-wide protests in fake municipality elections held in July will be repeated on November 20th... 

 

JNM, Amman-Jordan (Sunday, October 14, 2007): Does the phrase “rid me of this meddlesome priest” ring a bell? Whether in fact King Abdullah II of Jordan, whom many in the West view as a champion of peace and democratic values, uttered some such words about his political opponents, it is clear King Abdullah II’s intelligence community and his corrupt cohorts, such as the Minister of Interior Eid Al-Fayez and Major General Mohammad (Barzan) Dahabi, Director of General Intelligence Department, have taken it upon themselves to protect the king’s own selfish interests--and theirs. On Tuesday, October 9, 2007, King Abdullah II’s Military Court sentenced former MP Dr. Ahmed Oweidi Al-Abbadi to two years for speaking up against rampant corruption and exponential human rights abuses in Jordan, which will exclude Dr. Al-Abbadi from the parliamentary elections on November 20. Other reformers and civil rights leaders have declined to run for these elections simply because these elections will be a new showcase of fraud, governmental heavyhandedness, irregularities and violence, similar to the “gammy” municipality elections, held on Tuesday, July 31, 2007, and described by many local and international observes as a joke: http://www.jordannationalmovement.org/editorialfocus.htm.

Here is the evidence:

--Tens of thousands of voters have been deleted, transferred and reshuffled from one district to another with and without the knowledge of these voters. The mere purpose of this transferring process is to help pro-absolute monarchy (heads and notable men of tribes) win and guarantee their Parliamentary seats in these pre-cooked, fake elections. 

 

--The current one-person, one-vote elections system has divided the country into small districts of tribalism so the absolute monarchy can dominate and conquer the executive power for a lifetime. This partial electoral system has damaged the unity of the state and produced tribal MPs whose main concerns lie with personal gains and secure basic services, such as building new roads and installing electricity in their local districts and communities, rather than monitoring the national executive branch and enacting laws and legislations that would give impetus to and push political and economic reforms forward.

--Eid Al-Fayez stated on Friday, October 12, 2007, it is absolutely forbidden and illegal to monitor these parliamentary elections by local civil institutions or any other organization whatsoever…” Arabic version of this irresponsible and absurd decision:

October 12, 2007

العرب اليوم - رداد القلاب

جددت الحكومة وعلى لسان وزير الداخلية عيد الفايز امس رفضها رقابة مؤسسات المجتمع المدني او اي جهة كانت على الانتخابات المقبلة التي ستجرى في العشرين من تشرين الثاني. وقال الفايز خلال لقائه رجال الاعمال والمستثمرين أمس في مبني الوزارة انه "لا يجوز مراقبة الانتخابات".

What does this decision mean? Simply put: King Abdullah II and his security apparatus have already decided the outcome of these elections. On Saturday, September 22, 2007, Dr. Abdul Rahim Malhas, former MP and Minister of Health, stated, “The next Parliament in Jordan will be martial, pre-designed, has no power to oppose, lack strategic vision, and obedient [to absolute monarchy]...indeed, this type of Parliament shares and resembles the [chemical] properties of water…”

Today, King Abdullah II’s popularity is going down the drain and his performance since February 1999, does not inspire confidence…under his shaky leadership, elections on November 20 will be legally dubious and illegitimate...King Abdullah II is unwilling to flirt with genuine democracy…he is sowing the seeds of public disinterest in such a noble cause. A few weeks from now, the people of Jordan are awaiting another round of election skullduggery, already prepared and cooked by the flamboyant King Abdullah II and his intelligence community. Most foreign diplomats, human rights groups and independent elections monitors in Amman firmly believe that King Abdullah II’s candidates will win about 80 percent of the vote. That is enough to provide a comfortable margin for King Abdullah II, who needs only 51% to pass whatever laws he and his corrupt advisors at the royal court decide to design and ratify.  These elections will be discredited in Jordan and in the West. And whatever the outcome of these fake parliamentary elections, the corrupt tribal chieftains, pro thuggish regime, will be the key and major players to destroy whatever is left of opposition and institutions of civil rights in our beloved country, Jordan.

Highlights from Amman (Sunday, September 23, 2007):

JNM, Amman-Jordan (Sunday, September 23, 2007): The following pieces of news reported from Amman:

--Nabil Abdul Hadi, the Assistant Director of the Publications Department, announced today (Sunday, September 23rd) that his governmental department will now fully monitor the electronic publications in Jordan, a clear breach of press freedom in the absolute monarchical Kingdom of King Abdullah II. Tariq Al-Momni, Head of the Press Association, described this decision as a “backward step” in freedom of the press.

--The following quotes are from Jordanian personalities spoke in a public gathering in Amman on Saturday, September 22, 2007:

1. Dr. Faris Al-Fayez, a national Bedouin figure, stated, “I urge the [unelected] government to stop its harassment of Jordanians and allow Bedouins to join their fellow citizens in running for elections at any district they choose…Bedouins are fully aware of the [governmental] attempts to isolate and partition them…”

2. Dr. Soufian Al-Tal, from the Jordanian National Movement, stated, “the press and media have been officially directed not to publish any activities of this movement…this lack of access to press and media soon will be extended to electronic publications and TV satellites…”

3. Attorney Saleh Al-Armouti, President of the Jordan Bar Association, stressed that there are “renewed files controlling the political seen in the country these days…the [appointed] government and its apparatus are intervening in everything…I advise all opposition parties and figures not to participate in the next Parliament elections [slated for Nov. 20th, 07] simply because the next Parliament is now being worked on by the [unelected] government to serve as a rubber stamp…this Parliament will be the weakest ever in Jordan history…”

4. Toujan Faisal, Former MP, declared that she is “totally against dividing the country based on religious affiliation and race…Women quotas in Parliament is simply wrong…”

5. Dr. Rula Al-Hrroub, columnist in Al-Anbat newspaper, accused pro government writers in newspapers and magazines of being “hypocrites and liars” and attacked the appointed government of King Abdullah II for "harassing and threatening owners of independent newspapers…”

6. Dr. Abdul Rahim Malhas, former MP and Minister of Health, stated, “The unprecedented concentration of absolute power [in the king] has surfaced again…the general direction has been practically focusing on intensifying and centering power in the Royal Court…basically, the Court has been planning for everything, enacting policies and legislations, and making decisions [on behalf of the hand-picked government] , without any consultation, accountability or even public dissent [clear violations of the current constitution]…the next parliament in Jordan will be martial, predesigned, has no power to oppose, lack strategic vision, and obedient [to absolute monarchy]...indeed, this type of Parliament shares and resembles the [chemical] properties of water…”

King Abdullah II’s Next Show of Fake Democracy: Parliament Elections (Report #1)

Violent Clashes in Municipality Elections Set off By Electoral Fraud: Same Will Appear on November 20th...

JNM, Amman-Jordan (Sunday, September 16, 2007): Hopes for a democratic atmosphere in Jordan have been very cloudy since King Abdullah II assumed his absolute monarchical power in February 1999. This man uses double-face and double-talk: In Jordan, he directs his omnipresent and Gestapo-like security forces to interfere in elections results and outside the country, he appears and sounds like an honest leader and pro-Western style of democracy and human rights. The latest series of restraints instructed and imposed by the king and his unelected government will threaten and undermine the faith voters in the next Parliamentarian elections, slated for November 20, 2007, and secure the king’s lock on absolute power:

--The current elections law, one-person, one vote, introduced by the late King Hussein in 1993 and has never been changed since 2003, is very unfair and a showcase of barbaric monarchy:

--Vote-buying is now in full-swing: Dr. Saeed Diab, Spokesman for National Opposition Parties stated on Saturday, September 15, 2007, that “using money to buy votes in the next Parliament elections, under the blessing and watching eyes of government, is one early indication of the incredibility of these upcoming elections.” In an article appeared in Al-Arab Al Yawm newspaper on Saturday, September 15, 2007, the highly-respected journalist in Jordan, Fahad Al-Khitan, made it clear that “there is no one single opportunity exists for independent and national candidates, in most districts, to compete in the upcoming Parliamentarian elections simply because of dominate tribal competition [created by the above elections law] and the spree of rich candidates to buy votes from citizens, in an unprecedented vote-buying process that has never ever been seen in the country before…the government is not moving against such degrading process despite the legal ways and means that can be used to face and stop this process…” Al-Khitan continued to say, “during Ramadan, we will see all sorts and forms of ways to use money for buying votes under the cover that this money is used for charity purposes…the government is turning a blind eye to the vote-buying process despite warnings from civil leaders, opposition protests, documented and flagrant complaints by citizens…” On Sunday, May 27, the Editor-in-Chief of Al-Arab Al Yawm newspaper, Taher Al-Edwan, stated that “…it has become very clear to everybody that most Members of Parliament in Jordan win elections through the art of buying votes…” For example, one incumbent MP Nawaf Al-Zyoued, Al-Hashimiah District in Zarqa, is making daily stops in chicken stores these days: He stands beside stack of large chicken boxes, carrying a small copy of Al-Quran (Muslim holy book) …when a buyer steps in the store to buy chicken, Al-Zyoued offers one single chicken box to the buyer under one condition: Swear on Al-Quran to vote for me on November 20th. The latest offer from Al-Zyoued is buying 4 new pieces of car tires to citizens in Al-Hashimiah in exchange for votes!

--Similar to the widespread vote rigging and rampant violence in municipality elections held on Tuesday, July 31, 2007, electoral fraud, irregularities and violent clashes is widely expected on November 20th. This is mainly due to the tribal and impartial nature of the 1993 elections law that King Abdullah II has constantly refused to amend.

Report (2) is coming soon…stay tuned!

Highlights of the National Center for Human Rights’ Recent Report Re: the Widespread Vote Rigging in 2007 Municipality Elections

 

JNM, Amman-Jordan (Friday, September 14, 2007): The National Center for Human Rights (NCHR) in Jordan issued a stunning report http://www.nchr.org.jo/uploads/Municipality_report2007.pdf a few days ago criticizing the recent widespread forgery and rampant vote rigging in 2007 Municipality Elections. This report was prepared based on onsite visits by the NCHR staff, affidavits by many voters and press reports.

Here are some highlights and excerpts of this important report:

--Some security departments [General Intelligence Department and secret police] and administrative authorities [Minister of Interior and Governors] interfered directly [using multiple ghost voting] on behalf of pro monarchy candidates against other independent candidates.

 

--These security and governmental agencies put significant pressure on some candidates to withdraw so other [pro absolute monarchy] candidates can advance and win in several districts across the country.

--The 2007 Municipality Elections have not been taken place based on the terms of Constitution, and the 2007 Municipality Elections Law: Privacy of voting, direct voting, prosecuting violators of this elections law were all absent on Election Day. This has made these elections invalid and illegitimate.

 

--Governmental elections committees in some districts allowed citizens to vote multiple times despite objections by representatives of candidates. Pro government candidates were allowed to use cell phones inside the polling stations, others were denied this service.

--Names of so many registered voters disappeared and dropped intentionally by election authority from the voters rosters on Election Day.  

--Names of many voters appeared multiple times on different “voters rosters” in several poll stations which allowed multiple voting to occur. Voters in many polling stations were permitted to vote without a photo ID and without even checking their names on these rosters.

--Arrangements by election authority were made to allow women in several districts to vote multiple times: For example, rooms for changing clothes were made available for women so they can disguise and then vote again multiple times. Under legal age citizens were also allowed to vote.

--Journalists and reports were physically abused and, in several situations, forced to leave polling stations.

To add insult to injury, a few weeks later, the illustrious King Abdullah II rewarded the General Intelligence Department for their despicable role in these elections by promoting its Director Major General Mohammad (Barzan) Dahabi, to the rank of lieutenant general!

Human Rights Watch Blasts King Abdullah II’s Thuggish Regime

Human Rights Watch and other Jordan-based human rights organizations blast King Abdullah II’s absolute monarchical regime for its widespread human rights abuses: http://hrw.org/english/docs/2007/08/30/jordan16770.htm 

The report lists chilling abuses that reflect utter brutality and disrespect of human rights by King Abdullah II’s evil regime.

Human Rights Abuses Continue Under the Absolute Reign of King Abdullah II

JNM, Amman, Jordan (Sunday, August 26, 2007): Confused about King Abdullah II’s behavior? So are the Jordanians. King Abdullah II and his corrupt henchmen are striving to get richer and oppress Jordanians by almost any means, while they are appearing on the international stage as pro democracy, equality and human rights. If such contradictions confuse the international community, they also puzzle and trouble many Jordanians and help explain why Jordan’s spectacular absolute monarchy has produced as much cynicism and nihilism amongst the Jordanian citizens since King Abdullah II assumed his absolute power in February 1999. King Abdullah II’s unelected government has extended its invitation to human rights organizations to visit the regime’s prisons, including these ones that house political prisoners at the General Intelligence Directorate (GID) and else where in the corrupt Kingdom. During these pre-arranged visits, many prisoners protested the daily ill-treatment committed against them by the secret police. At Swagah prison alone, more than one hundred prisoners were admitted into hospitals after fierce protests against their daily human rights abuses. This incident happened in the presence of representatives of New York-based Human Rights Watch and Amman-based Adaleh Center and Human and Environment Observatory.

Confidential reports from Amman confirmed to JNM that secret police entered the Swagah prison, immediately after these human rights representatives left prison facilities, looking for those inmates who spoken up freely re: their daily ordeals and human rights abuses that they have been subjected to by King Abdullah II's Gestapo-like security forces. The outcome: Additional inmates were beaten up very harshly by these cruel forces due to their frank talk and openness to these representatives, and rushed to adjacent hospitals and medical centers because of their serious injuries. In addition, the new Director (from Public Security Department) of Swaqah prison told his staff that he has full authority to shave the beards of prisoners by force. To accomplish this inhuman task, he ordered several face-covered police officers inside prison cells despite warnings from his aids not to do so. The result of these ghoulish raids: Further clashes erupted and many prisoners were physically attacked. Furthermore, the incoming Director told his staff that he has “additional authority from above to beat up and abuse prisoners whenever and whatever it takes.”

Abdul Karim Shridah, Chairman of Prisons and Jails Committee at the Arab Organization for Human Rights (AOHR) stated on Sunday, August 26, 2007, that “We have received several written complaints from families of prisoners in Swagah and Juwaidah prisons stated to the effect that their sons have been subjected to daily kicking, torture, physical and psychological abuses” by King Abdullah II’s security apparatus. Eng. Maysarra Malass, Chairman of Freedom Committee at the Jordanian Engineers Association, stated that prisoners, including political ones, have been subjected to “beating, forced head-and beard-shaving, and cruel treatment” by prisons authorities. Alaa Abu Tair, a prisoner in Swagah, died on Saturday, August 25, 2007, due to this agony and endless torment abuses. More information: http://www.jordantimes.com/?news=1746

The international community must keep an open eye on King Abdullah II’s tragic record of human rights abuses, his zigzagged moves towards democracy and the rule of law. Any foreign assistance to King Abdullah II’s regime must be pegged to its progress toward democratic reform and full respects for human rights. So far, King Abdullah II has shown very little to prove that he is a responsible man who believes in what the Jordanian people deserve: Respect and genuine political freedom.

King Abdullah II’s New Style of Beat Up Squads

JNM, Amman-Jordan (Tuesday, August 28, 2007): Right before dusk, seven undercover members of King Abdullah II’s Beat Up Squads abducted Member of Parliament Dr. Al-Ali Alatoum, Irbid-First District, for a few hours. During this abduction, these gangs punched, kicked and beaten up Dr. Alatoum before throwing him out on the road in a remote area in Irbid Province. The vicious attackers also shaved his beard by force (see above picture), similar to the incident that occurred in Swaqah prison a few days ago (read story below). Friends and relatives of Dr. Alatoum stressed that these cowards are state agents who have been recruited by King Abdullah II and his brutal gangs in the General Intelligence Department (GID) to plant seeds of fear and panic amongst political and human rights activists in the Jordanian society. Dr. Alatoum has recently spoken up against the widespread fraud in municipality elections held across Jordan on Tuesday, July 31, 2007.  Dr. Alatoum is 65 years old, holds a Ph.D. in Arabic Literature, and a scholar who wrote several books and published many articles in national and international journals and magazines.

Further unfolding information re: this absurd incident: http://www.jordantimes.com/?news=1806

The above is another evidence of the brutality of King Abdullah II and his terrorist regime that reminds Jordanians and human rights defenders around the world of these death squads roaming now on the streets of Baghdad and other thuggish dictators who have committed all sorts of cruelty and terror against freedom fighters…The Jordan National Movement will soon write letters to the Boards of Trustees of those institutions of higher education, such as George Town University, that have granted King Abdullah II honorary degrees to withdraw this high honor that has been bestowed upon a king that has lost his own face-value and honor...shame on him!

Human Rights Organizations to Visit GID's Prisoners

The following press release was issued by Human Rights Watch in New York. The Jordan National Movement (JNM) will follow this news very closely and make comments pending the outcome of this important visit.

Jordan: Rights Groups to Visit

Intelligence Agency Prison

First Visit by Independent Experts

(Amman, August 15, 2007) – The Jordanian intelligence agency has agreed to allow independent human rights monitoring organizations to visit prisoners at its secretive detention facility for the first time, Human Rights Watch said today.  

" The General Intelligence Department’s welcome decision to allow independent monitoring of its detention and interrogation operations should improve conditions for detainees. Ongoing and regular visits by competent and independent civil society organizations help ensure detainees are treated properly. "
Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director at Human Rights Watch
  
Contribute

Also Available in

arabic 
On July 15, 2007, the agency granted representatives of Human Rights Watch and the Jordanian-based Adaleh Center and Human and Environment Observatory permission to access the facility in August and to speak to detainees there. The three organizations will carry out their visit during the second half of August and seek meetings with intelligence officials and military prosecutors from the State Security Court to discuss areas of concern.  
 
“The General Intelligence Department’s welcome decision to allow independent monitoring of its detention and interrogation operations should improve conditions for detainees,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director at Human Rights Watch. “Ongoing and regular visits by competent and independent civil society organizations help ensure detainees are treated properly.”  
 
In a September 2006
report, Human Rights Watch alleged that intelligence officers from the General Intelligence Department frequently detain suspects arbitrarily and mistreat them, including by prolonged solitary confinement. There are also persistent complaints about a lack of access to detainees by lawyers and family members. In a January 2007 report, the UN special rapporteur on torture found that torture is routine at the facility. Jordanian officials deny those allegations.  
 
Prior to and immediately after publication of its report, Human Rights Watch met with the leadership of the intelligence agency to discuss its findings. The agency’s director, Maj. Gen. Muhammad al-Dhahabi, at that time extended an invitation to Human Rights Watch to visit the facility. After a meeting in June, both sides agreed on the terms of such visits, which included the participation of Jordanian representatives. The intelligence agency agreed to the participation of two Jordanian participants.  
 
“This is a chance for independent Jordanian activists to help protect the human rights of their fellow citizens without fear of repercussions,” said Asem Raba’ba, president of the Adaleh Center, who has inspected ordinary Jordanian prisons. “It is a step ahead for civil society’s role in promoting human rights in Jordan.”  
 
The intelligence agency previously granted visits only to organizations affiliated with the government or on the basis of a formal agreement. In 2005, the government-controlled National Center for Human Rights conducted its first visit to the detention facility. Since then, the center has conducted three visits. Over the past year, members of Jordanian political parties and parliamentarians from the Public Freedoms Committee of the Lower House of Parliament also visited the center. The International Committee of the Red Cross conducts visits every two weeks, but in accordance with its general mandate, reports directly to the government on its findings and does not make them public.  
 
“Public reporting based on ongoing, regular, independent visits by local activists will give Jordan’s intelligence agency the opportunity to inspire confidence in its operations,” said Taleb al-Saqqaf, director of the Human and Environment Observatory, who also has experience in inspecting Jordanian prisons.

Picture and Comment:

JNM, Amman-Jordan (Friday, July 27, 2007): Very early today, 4:00AM-5:00AM, the personal car of Osama Al-Ramini, Editor-in-Chief of the Weekly News publication, was set on fire and completely destroyed by undercover officers from the General Intelligence Department (GID) and supporters of King Abdullah II’s regime. In his weekly articles, Mr. Al-Ramini has been very critical of the anarchy and misery that is going on in Jordan these days. Also, he has been outspoken against the daily human rights abuses and severe corruption cases hitting high gear in the Hashemite Kingdom of Corruption (HKC) lead by the new dictator King Abdullah II. This is another evidence of so many that proves and shows to the civilized world how King Abdullah II, his corrupt regime and omnipresent secret police behave: Terrorizing society, intimidating journalists and opposition, and muzzling voices of freedom to keep holding their dirty and iron grip on absolute power and absurd tyranny in our homeland Jordan!  

In Pictures: Samples of How King Abdullah II’s Secret Police and Undercover Intelligence Officers Attack the People of Jordan...This is the Only Language they Use and Understand…Language of Oppression and Evil Terrorism…

On Friday, July 6, 2007, seven soccer players from Sareeh Soccer Club (SSC), beaten up by King Abdullah II's security forces, in the City of Irbid, due to the fact that the SSC team defeated the security forces' favorite club, Kufrsum!

 

Unelected Prime Minister Accuses Parliament of Blocking Political Reforms in Jordan!!!

Left: Unelected Prime Minister Bakhit Meeting HRW Delegation in Amman    

Right: Current MPs Read Verses of Quran (Muslim Holy Book) Upon Saddam Hussein’s Soul!      

JNM, Amman, Jordan (Thursday, July 5, 2007): Like King, Like Prime Minister: both lie to their own people and the international community. In a recent meeting with Human Rights Watch (http://hrw.org/doc/?t=mideast&c=jordan) delegation in Amman, the unelected Prime Minister of Jordan, Marrouf Bakhit, stated that "the current Parliament has delayed the political reforms process in Jordan," a flat lie and fabrication designed to mislead the international audience and human rights observers. Bakhit is a graduate of the Hashemite School of Corruption (HSC).

Parliament in Jordan is a rubber stamp and the majority of its members have been elected via illegitimate means, such as vote-buying (read the next news story below). King Abdullah II and his intelligence community have always been working very hard and behind closed doors to create Parliament that the great majority of its members are merely tribal servicemen rather than professional legislators. This way, the unaccountable, weak and unpopular king and his unelected government rule freely and absolutely, and enjoy no challenges whatsoever from the legislative branch.

The only way to achieve genuine democracy and bring freedom to the people of Jordan is for the king to step aside (constitutional monarchy) and allow the people of Jordan to elect their own Prime Minister, Parliament and Senate, freely and without direct or indirect interference by the General Intelligence Directorate (GID) and royal court.

Above news report of this meeting published by the weekly Al-Majd Newspaper on Monday, July 2, 2007:

ÇáÈÎíÊ íÊåã ãÌáÓ ÇáäæÇÈ ÈÚÑÞáÉ ÚãáíÉ ÇáÇÕáÇÍ ÇáÓíÇÓí

 

ÚáãÊ "ÇáãÌÏ" Çä ÇáÏß澄 ãÚÑæÝ ÇáÈÎíÊ¡ ÑÆíÓ ÇáæÒÑÇÁ ÞÏ ÇäÍì ÈÇááÇÆãÉ Úáì ãÌáÓ ÇáäæÇÈ ÇáÍÇáí¡ Ýí ÊÃÎíÑ ÚãáíÉ ÇáÇÕáÇÍ ÇáÓíÇÓí¡ æÇáÇäÝÊÇÍ ÇáÏíãæÞÑÇØí¡ ÌÑÇÁ ÊÑßíÈÊå ÇáãÍÇÝÙÉ ÇáÊí ÊÚÇßÓ ÇáÊæÌåÇÊ ÇáÑÓãíÉ áÌáÇáÉ Çáãáß¡ æÇáÍßæãÉ ÇáÍÇÖÑÉ·


æÞÇá ÇáÈÎíÊ áÏì áÞÇÆå æÝÏ ãäÙãÉ åíæãä ÑÇíÊÓ ææÊÔ ÇáÇÓÈæÚ ÇáãÇÖí¡ Çä ãÌáÓ ÇáäæÇÈ ÞÏ ÚÑÞá ÇáßËíÑ ãä ÇáÞæÇäíä æÇáÊÔÑíÚÇÊ ÇáÊí ßÇä ãä ÔÃäåÇ ÊÚÒíÒ ÇáÊäãíÉ ÇáÓíÇÓíÉ¡ æÊÚãíÞ ÇáÊÌÑÈÉ ÇáÏíãæÞÑÇØíÉ¡ æÏÝÚåãÇ Çáì ÇáÇãÇã·


æäÞá ÇáæÝÏ Úä ÇáÈÎíÊ Þæáå Çä ÍßæãÊå áã ÊÏÎÑ¡ æáä ÊÏÎÑ ÌåÏÇð¡ ááãÖí Ýí ãÓíÑÉ ÇáÇÕáÇÍ ÇáÓíÇÓí¡ æãÍÇÑÈÉ ÇáÝÓÇÏ¡ æÇÔÇÚÉ ÇáÍÑíÇÊ ÇáÚÇãÉ¡ ÎÕæÕÇð ÇÐÇ ãÇ ÇÝÑÒÊ ÇáÇäÊÎÇÈÇÊ ÇáäíÇÈíÉ ÇáãÞÈáÉ ÈÑáãÇäÇð ÚÕÑíÇð æÏíãæÞÑÇØíÇð íÔÏ ÇÒÑ ÇáÍßæãÉ¡ ÈÏá Çä íãÇÑÓ ÇáÔÏ ÇáÚßÓí ÔÃä ãÇ ÝÚá ÇáÈÑáãÇä

Kissing the Right Hand of a Thuggish Dictator:

JNM, Amman-Jordan (Friday, June 22, 2007): The New Saddam Hussein in the Middle East: King Abdullah II of Jordan, Extends His Right Hand to People in Jordan for Kissing, a Ludicrous Ritual that Even his Father, the Late King Hussein, Refused to Do, But the Dictator of Iraq, Saddam Hussein, Loved it!!! 

Using Military Tanks Instead of Human Dialogue: The Ghoulish Leadership of King Abdullah II:

                                                                                                           

JNM, Amman-Jordan (Sunday, June 10, 2007): A few hours before writing this report, military tanks and bulldozers were seen rolling on the streets of Shuneh, a small city, South-West of Amman, terrorizing farmers and poor citizens by demolishing their farms, water wells and houses. The unelected government proceeded with this destruction operation after receiving the okay from King Abdullah II, the unelected and unaccountable lifetime king, who is in recent years has been using a guerrilla-type of campaign that brings to mind the martial law era applied by his father in the 1970s and 1980s.

So far, one farmer died, Mahmmoud Al-Edwan, and dozens injured. A wave of protests and sabotage, ignited by King Abdullah II’s ghastly security forces, has surged across the city (see photo above). Instead of directing his unelected government to calm the situation and resort all parties to positive and constructive dialogue, King Abdullah II instructed his hand-picked Ministers and Secret Police to intensify their crackdown on framers and protesters who have been wrongly accused by the government of building houses and digging water wells illegally on land owned by the state. Farmers, who feel politically and economically disenfranchised, insist that they have decided to do this after petitions, submitted to the government to discuss this controversial issue, were turned down and out of fear that this land would be sold to “fat cats” and “crooks” in the royal court, unelected government and business community who have purchased pieces of this land in the past at very cheap price and sold it to foreign investors for outrageous profit, all this has been done before the eyes of the corrupt government and on the backbones of the city residents. These farmers emphasized that these pieces of farming land should have been sold to them at reasonable prices and provided with low-interest loans so they can stay in their villages and countryside instead of emigrating to the capital Amman and other major cities in the country, causing unwanted traffic problems, housing shortage and surging prices of produce.

Farmers fear has resonated across the country and brought back to memory the scandal that focused on King Abdullah II who sold large lands of military bases and barracks in Zarqa Province to foreign investors a few years ago and deposited the proceeds in his private bank accounts, instead of state coffers. The same is happening now in downtown Al-Abddali in Amman, where citizens in the neighborhoods of this area were given two choices by the government: sell your real state voluntarily to Saad Al-Harriri Construction Company, the Lebanese politician and tycoon, and business associates (among them members of the royal family in Jordan) or we (the government) will force you to sell it.

In summary, Jordan today seems to share the vices of defunct-and current-absolute monarchical and thuggish regimes in

the region and worldwide, in which state resources are marshaled by corrupt officials in the royal courts and dictatorial governments with an eye toward maintaining their hold on power and, in many cases, like the one above, enriching themselves and their extended families and cohorts. But, the code of silence is now breaking among Jordanians, and penitent citizens are telling all: The corrupt absolute monarchy in Jordan must step down…this is the magic bullet to cut corruption and bring freedom to the people of Jordan!

Gross Labor Violations Conducted by the Unelected Government of King Abdullah II:

JNM, Amman-Jordan (Tuesday, June 5, 2007): A new solid evidence shows and proves how the regime of King Abdullah II violates the basic principals of human rights in Jordan: http://www.nlcnet.org/article.php?id=324. This scandal represents the danger of forging trade agreements with this thuggish, dictatorial and undemocratic regime in Amman!

Previous reports and comments:

http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=5034

http://www.lotusorganics.com/articles/JordanGarmentWorkers.aspx

King Abdullah II’s Ghastly Security Forces: Setbacks and Barbarian Style!

Amman, JNM (Sunday, April 15, 2007): The picture above speak volume! A Jordanian driver, Khalid Mahasnah, beat up brutally and disgracefully by 15 police officers on Saturday, April 7, 2007, just because he asked a police officer to move his car out so he can park his transportation bus in the designated, legal area. His injuries include: bleeding under the eyelid, several bruises all over his body, broken arm, knee injures and kicks in the stomach and face. This simply describes the daily barbarian fashion of King Abdullah II’s security forces.

Lieutenant General Muhammad Al-Eitan, Director of Public Security, spoke, on Saturday, April 14, 2007, against human rights organizations, asking the press and media to stand up for these organizations and claiming that, under the leadership of King Abdullah II, Jordan has a very clean human rights record!

The final thoughts will be left to the educated readership of this site to find out how the regime of King Abdullah II is deceiving and bluffing to the local audience and international community!

The National Campaign for Students Rights: Another New and Powerful Organization Established Against the Tyrannical Power of King Abdullah II

Amman, JNM (April 8, 2007): The slogan for this newly established student organization reads: “You Have Killed Us!” It is a serious slogan that is now being raised by every single college student in Jordan. The mission of the National Campaign for Students Rights (NCSR) is to raise awareness at the national and international arenas that King Abdullah II’s corrupt regime must stop terrorizing the people of Jordan. Organizers of this growing campaign stress the following:

1. Student unions, clubs and organizations must be left alone and out of the strict surveillance and monitoring schemes of King Abdullah II’s secret police, intelligence officers and undercover spies. On a daily basis, the king's Gestapo-like security agents enter college student classrooms and summon activists to the General Intelligence Department (GID) offices for interrogation that usually include, but not limited to, physical abuse, jail time and eventually lead to expelling those students from their institutions permanently.

2. Expelling and suspending students due to their peaceful and political activities on campuses at all colleges and universities must be stopped immediately. According to the new discipline system at the University of Jordan, “any student caught distributing a political statement on campus will be expelled immediately.” The irony is that the same system suspends a student for two consecutive semesters if he or she is caught using or distributing drugs at the University!

3. Exponential rise in tuition and fees and the dwindling support of the government towards state-supported institutions of higher learning (stands now at 23%) must be investigated fully and immediately. The current annual state tuition, which is expected to rise significantly in the coming weeks, for a full-time student is $6,200. This represents a disaster for college students in a country that almost 40 percent of its population is below the poverty line; 70 percent of its citizens are severely poor, and more than 20 percent of the labor force is unemployed.

4. The ongoing absurd issue of accusing students of instigating national divide, slanders and libels, and sectarianism against the state simply because they speak out against the current unjust system of governance on and off campuses must be addressed and resolved immediately.

King Abdullah’s political and economic reforms are not working: Jordan’s shuffle toward economic reforms is choreographed by the royal family elites, calling themselves new economic and political reformers, but clinging to power and self-interests. The tyrannical regime of King Abdullah II has been pumping out bribes, envelopes of hush money and expensive gifts to sustain the royal family members and their buddies’ enterprises. The royal family in Jordan has tolerated, encouraged, and participated in schemes to bleed factories of their assets, banks of their deposits, and citizens of their savings. No true Jordanian would disagree. Almost nothing in the Jordanian economy is on a firm footing. King Abdullah II, his wife Queen Rania and their “gay” business partner, Bassim Awadallah, are fully responsible for all of this mess.  

Ordinary Jordanian households at the bottom of the economic food chain were left to pay the bill. Inflation is on the rise. Taxes soared as the king tried to cover the huge deficits his own foolish policies had created. Jordanians are in sharper pain. Dozens of already broke enterprises are being pushed into bankruptcy, hundreds of already idled workers are losing their jobs, and trading companies left the country to go elsewhere in the region.

Our beloved country is going to rack and ruin. Many economic experts, local and foreign, continue to stress the fragility of Jordan’s economy, and the anxiety of its people. Adoption of quick and radical economic reforms is too much for the country to bear. Jordanians are firm believers in gradual economic reforms, but they also stand strongly against the current scope of regulation, the sheer size of the public sector, and a centralized, abusive and dictatorial political system that provide only ample opportunities for massive corruption and human rights abuses.

Constitutional changes that would shift executive power from the king to a Prime Minister, elected directly by the people, is also very vital and the hallmark of any true democratic and genuine free trade system. Full respect of Jordanians’ civil rights must be kept in mind. Physical abuses, suppressing dissenting voices and official harassment of political activists, students and journalists must be curbed once and forever.

Open Letter to Human Rights Watch:

The Honorable Jane Olsonking-abdullah_2411

Human Rights Watch

350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor
New York, NY 10118

Dear Madam Olson:

I am writing you on behalf of the Executive Leadership of the Jordan National Movement (JNM) in Amman, Jordan. In my joint capacity as the Secretary of Foreign Affairs of the Jordan National Movement (JNM), it was determined that I should contact you regarding the ongoing harassment of Dr. Ahmad Oweidi Al-Abbadi, former Member of Parliament (two terms) and current Chairman of JNM, by King Abdullah II’s regime.

Over the past few days, Dr. Al-Abbadi has received serious threats from King Abdullah II’s inner circle, namely from Sheriff Fawaz Bin Zabin, King Abdullah II’s current Advisor for Tribal Affairs. According to the Executive Leadership of JNM in Amman, Mr. Zabin has enlisted several individuals to attack Dr. Al-Abbadi physically and insult him personally by using press and media campaigns against him and his family. This absurd plan has been designed by King Abdullah II himself and the Chief of General Intelligence Directorate General Mohammed Al-Thahabi to silence and discredit Dr. Al-Abbadi in Jordan and the international arena.

The regime’s security services are using methods of intimidation to silence national opponents, including Dr. Al-Abbadi. The disastrous human rights records of King Abdullah II’s regime must not be allowed to pass without you pausing to remember the victims in Jordan who are not allowed to speak out for themselves without fear of prosecution, incarceration, torment and death.

The current monarchical political system in Jordan has become a brutal web of overlapping security services; many people have been recruited and assigned to be informers, and there is dexterous use of propaganda and fear to induce cooperation. King Abdullah II has been a master of protecting himself by fooling the international community, and bribing, dividing and co-opting his political foes. Please read the most recent reports regarding these important issues: http://www.carnegieendowment.org/files/cp76_choucair_final.pdf

http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?id=2442&l=1

We, respectfully and immediately, urge you to bring King Abdullah II’s regime in compliance with Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and contact the U.S. Congress and administration to immediately reconsider the most favored-nation trade status with the unelected government of King Abdullah II. Please send strongly worded letters to King Abdullah II and Jordan’s foreign donors regarding these key issues: the ongoing travesty of justice and democracy, the dreadful human rights abuses and the new amendments to the Press and Publication Law (sets heavy financial penalties for press violations: $700 to $15,000) and Penalties Law. Under concerted pressure from the appointed government and royal court, the unelected Senate and vote-buying Parliament (a scientific poll conducted by the Centre for Strategic Studies at the University of Jordan in Amman in July of 2003 reported that 73.5 percent of those people surveyed have witnessed “vote buying” during the last parliamentarian elections) recently ratified these new amendments to the Law of Penalties:

§         Allows for the prosecution and imprisonment of journalist(s) and individual(s) who commit action or publish an opinion that represents an insult to people’s religious sentiments or beliefs,  instigates sectarianism or racism, slanders or libels against the state, individuals or their personal freedoms and spreads false information or rumors about them.

§         Forbids sending emails that carry criticism of the king and royal family, stressing such emails must be considered as a form of terrorism: The punishment is 3 years in prison plus hard labor.

§         Equates the punishment of terrorists with those who express their opinions freely and criticize the king and royal family.

This is the story of King Abdullah II: Great leader in the eyes of the world, but a thuggish dictator back home. The Jordanian National Movement calls on the international community and international human rights organizations to exert constant pressure on the king’s regime to conduct itself within the boundaries of international humanitarian law and ensure the protection of Jordanian political opposition figures in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international law, and the numerous United Nations Resolutions upholding these rights. All human rights crimes targeting heroes of liberty and freedom of expression should be stopped. We at the Jordanian National Movement will continue to shed light on the Jordanian regime's human rights abuses and strongly urge you to do everything within your power to investigate King Abdullah II’s ongoing violations of basic international human rights standards.

Our most sincere thanks,

Dr. Abdul Salam Al-Mualla
Jordan National Movement, Secretary of Foreign Affairs

Virginia, United States of America

 

Cc:

President George W. Bush

Dr. Condoleeza Rice, U.S. Secretary of State

Members of the U.S. Congress

Board of Directors, Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), Washington, DC

Press and Media

Dr. Ahmad Oweidi Al-Abbadi Received Serious Threats:

JNM, Amman-Jordan (Friday, March 16, 2007): Dr. Ahmad Oweidi Al-Abbadi, Chairman of the Jordan National Movement (JNM) and former Member of Parliament (two terms), received serious threats today from the thuggish regime of King Abdullah II. Sheriff Fawaz Bin Zabin, King Abdullah II’s current Advisor for Tribal Affairs (widely known in Jordan as the smuggler of sheep and cattle across the borders with Iraq), enlisted several individuals from Dr. Abbadi’s tribe to attack Dr. Al-Abbadi physically and insult him personally by using press and media campaigns against him and his family. This absurd and ludicrous plan has been designed by the Chief of General Intelligence Directorate General Mohammed Al-Thahabi (known in Jordan as Barzan Al-Thahabi) and the smuggler Bin Zabin to discredit Dr. Al-Abbadi in Jordan and the international arena. Over the past few months or so, Dr. Al-Abbadi’s support base and popularity in Jordan have risen, and this in itself poses a threat to the Hashemite Kingdom of corruption!

If the above plan is implemented, Jordan National Movement (JNM) will file a lawsuit in the US Federal court system against King Abdullah II, General Mohammed Al-Thahabi and Sheriff Fawaz Bin Zabin. JNM has officially hired a legal team lead by Mr. Robert Dearborn in Washington, DC, to pursue this legal case at the appropriate time.

King Abdullah II's “Vote-Buying” and “Bribed” Parliament Ratified, on Sunday, March 4, 2007, a New Law that Supports Incarceration of Journalists!!!

JNM, Amman-Jordan: King Abdullah II's Parliament, comprised of many members who have been elected based on “vote-buying,” bribery and forgery, supported by our illustrious King Abdullah II and his intelligence community, "endorsed the press and publications draft law (on Sunday, March 4, 2007), which allows for the imprisonment of journalists and sets heavy financial penalties for press violations. Deputies yesterday approved recommendations presented by the National Guidance Committee on fines for violators, four days after they endorsed articles that make it possible for journalists to be imprisoned for publishing material deemed offensive. Fines for perceived press and publication offences range between JD500 ($700) to JD10,000 ($15,000) depending on the type of violation, according to the committee’s recommendations,

As deliberations on the law drew to a close, several deputies, including members of the Islamic Action Front ( IAF) and independent lawmakers, attempted to re-open discussion on controversial articles that specify press violations, but the House voted against their proposal. IAF deputies wanted to limit press violations to degradation, defamation, vilification or abuse of any religion protected under the Constitution and the abuse of prophets, whether in writings, illustrations, pictures, symbolism or any other means. They protested against what they described as “ambiguous articles” that could put any journalist in danger of retribution. The Islamists also wanted to cancel articles that allow for the prosecution of journalists if they commit any action that represents an insult to people’s religious sentiments or beliefs, or instigates sectarianism or racism, and another article that covers slander or libel against individuals or their personal freedoms, as well as spreading false information or rumours about them.

Press groups decried the House decision to approve the imprisonment clause and described it as a step in the wrong direction in the Kingdom’s stride towards democracy and freedom of expression. Jordan Press Association (JPA) President Tareq Momani said the Lower House’s decision would shackle rather than free the press. “We feel disappointed because we were hopeful that Parliament would support freedom of opinion since it is a democratic institution,” he told The Jordan Times. The Centre for Defending Journalists issued a statement saying the Lower House move was “painful strike to press freedoms.” “What happened harms Jordan’s democratic reputation, contributes to limiting freedom and muzzles journalists,” the statement added," according to a report published by the Jordan Times newspaper on Monday, March 5, 2007.

 

Jordanian Journalists Protest on Sunday, March 4, 2007, Outside the Building of King Abdullah II's Parliament, Against the Endorsement of the Despicable Press and Publications Draft Law

 

Cameras of Jordanian Journalists Hung at the Fence of Parliament in Protest of this Despicable Law!

Agence France Presse published the following piece of news on Thursday, March 1, 2007 re: the above ludicrous decision:

Jordan parliament approves jail for journalists

Thu Mar 1, 6:26 AM ET

Jordan's Press Association (JPA) slammed parliament on Thursday for approving a clause in a draft law which allows the imprisonment of journalists.

"We reject this decision. We are opposed to the imprisonment of journalists for expressing their opinions by writing, verbally or by any other means, and linking this to four taboos," JPA president Tareq Momani told AFP.

"At the same time we welcome parliament's decision to scrap a clause calling for the arrest of journalists over publication matters," he added.

During its deliberations of a controversial press and publication draft law, the 110-seat lower house approved on Wednesday a clause to imprison journalists over four violations outlined in Article 26.

Journalists could go to jail if they "defame any religion protected under the constitution", namely Islam, Christianity and Judaism, or if they "offend the prophets" in writing or through the publication of cartoons.

They could also face imprisonment if their writing is seen as an "insult to religious sentiments and beliefs, fuelling sectarian strife or racism," and finally if it "slanders or libels" any individual, Petra news agency said.

MP Jamal Dmur told AFP parliament's decision on jail terms was final, but Momeni expressed the hope that the lower house, which has yet to discuss other clauses of the draft law ahead of a final vote, will retract its decision.

"We will continue to put pressure on parliament to retract its decisions for the sake of freedom of expression and Jordan's efforts to push for democratic reforms," he added.

Almost a year ago the government, under pressure from domestic and international rights groups to raise the level of press freedoms in Jordan, sent parliament a new press and publication draft law.

The 2006 U.S. Department of State's Human Rights Report on Jordan:

Death Threats Issued to the Leadership of JNM & Outgoing Emails to King Abdullah of Jordan are Forbidden!

After his recent imbalanced and foolish speech to Joint Session of U.S. Congress, where he sharply criticized the State of Israel and did NOT bother to mention or criticize terrorist organizations (the real threat to peace in the Middle East), such as Hamas and Hizb Allah (Party of God), King Abdullah II issued his absolute royal directives to the current corrupt, vote-buying and rubber-stamp Parliament to enact a law that forbids sending emails that carry criticism of the king and royal family, stressing such emails must be considered as a form of terrorism: The punishment is 3 years in prison!!!

Also, JNM just learned that King Abdullah II has issued his directives to the General Intelligence Directorate to find ways of implicating or assassinating members of JNM leadership in Jordan and abroad!!!

Further, in a meeting held on Monday, March 12, 2007, at the royal court, King Abdullah II told his top appointed and corrupt cohorts and henchmen that after his recent stumpy speech at the US Congress, Jordan’s interest are now being threatened by pro-Israeli lobbyists in Washington, DC.  

More information and analysis on these important developments are coming up soon!

Please stay tuned…..

Breaking News (Saturday, January 27, 2007): Dr. Ahmad Oweidi Al-Abbadi Received Serious Threats from King Abdullah II and his Chief of the General Intelligence Directorate (GID), General Mohammad Al-Thahabi

Amman, Jordan: Dr. Ahmad Oweidi Al-Abbadi, current Chairman of Jordan National Movement (JNM) and former member of Parliament (two terms), received serious threats a few hours ago from King Abuddlah II and the Chief of his intelligence community in Jordan, General Mohammed Al-Thahabi (known in Jordan as Barzan Al-Thahabi). Threats include killing or incarcerating Dr. Al-Abbadi and his sons, demolishing his house in Amman or putting him under house arrest due to his peaceful political activities against the absolute monarchical regime in Jordan.

The Executive Leadership of JNM urges the international community, worldwide human rights organizations, the U.S. government and Congress and European Union to interfere in this serious matter and end the suffering of political and human rights activists in Jordan, such as Dr. Al- Abbadi, and the ongoing daily oppression of the Jordanian people.

Also, JNM’s leadership in the U.S. is seeking the advise of prominent attorneys in Washington, DC, to file a lawsuite in the U.S. Federal court system against Jordan’s dictator King Abdullah II and thuggish General Barzan Al-Thahabi.

Human Rights Reports on Jordan: Significant Violations are Usually Met with Persistent Denials and Condemnations by King Abdullah II and his Corrupt Regime!